TECHNET Archives

September 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mumtaz Bora <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Mumtaz Bora <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:13:44 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
Thank-You Mike, noted your points and much appreciated. We will follow up with some measurements.


Thank-you
Mumtaz
858-795-0112
Peregrine  Semiconductor


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Fenner
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Solder paste print thickness vs. reflowed thickness for SMT packages

As Joyce and others have indicated, there are too many variables to answer your question specifically.
Almost all type 3 stencil grade pastes will contain 50% +/- by volume of metal. [The variance in weight %  for different alloys e.g. Sn63 and SAC is to keep the volume the same according to alloy density.] The theoretical height is therefore 50%. In practice it won't be, variables being transmission efficiency of the specific paste you are using.(Modern pastes are significantly better in this respect than most older/established types). Stencil type, quality and thick/aspect ratio, your board and your print parameters and so on. 45% as mentioned below equates to overall transmission efficiency for the process of 90%, that's not bad. Again as indicated, for these reasons if you want more accuracy than the guidelines offered you will have to measure.

Regards

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joyce Koo
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 10:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Solder paste print thickness vs reflowed thickness for SMT packages

(1) flux loading - and type of flux, no clean got low residue and no residue type, the transfer efficiency also play a role
(2) package type and lead geometry/surface finishing type also play a role
- including wetting characteristic of the lead
(3) best is to laser scan the print paste thickness and cross section your pwa in some area and get few package style for your application - your own database (better use for old paste that may have questionable transfer efficiency, especially, small aperture type).
my 2 cents.
     jk
> Dear All,  Does anyone have estimates ,measurements or  correlation
> for printed paste thickness ( lead free- No clean) vs reflowed paste
> height for the 5 mil and 4 mil  paste print thicknesses.
>
>
> Thank-you
> Mumtaz
> 858-795-0112
> Peregrine  Semiconductor
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including
> attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it
> is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
> Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking
> of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities
> other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this
> in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2