TECHNET Archives

September 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:50:50 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (165 lines)
Hi Juliano,

Here is something that you might want to look at to set a benchmark for
your machines:

http://www.practicalcomponents.com/home/print-view.cfm?type=pcb&prid=1027&phid=284

Steve

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Datacom - Juliano Ribeiro <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The components are 0402” up to BGA 50x50.
>
> We joint all data and it is used the same criteria.
>
> Current we have 4 SMT Line (3 Lines with NPM-W @2011 and 1 Line XP1/2
> @2004).
>
>
>
> We would like to use the benchmark index to start the control.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> _____________________________
>
> Juliano Bettim Ribeiro
>
> DATACOM
>
> +55 (51) 8446-2135
>
> +55 (51) 3933-3000
>
> Ramal: 3484
>
>
>
>
>
> De: Larry Dzaugis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Enviada em: terça-feira, 1 de setembro de 2015 17:53
> Para: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Datacom - Juliano Ribeiro
> Assunto: Re: [TN] Pick and Place Performance (Reject Rate)
>
>
>
> What parts are picked?
>
> How old are they?
>
> Were they stored properly?
>
> Are the recommended PM's performed?
>
>
>
> Depends on the machine, feeder, nozzle and part.
>
>
>
> I have parts that are far better than that and marginally designed
> material that is worse.
>
> Parts that vary more than the allowed tolerance tend to have low pick
> rates and ones with inconsistent finishes, badly applied or inflexible tape
> and difficult features for vacuum pick up are lower.
>
>
>
> My information is on a machine that was spec'ed on performance rather than
> price and has less than 4k hours on it.
>
>
>
> It does a terrific job on the jobs in its wheelhouse and not so great on
> ones outside the strike zone. The previous statement can be made for most
> machines still in production.
>
>
>
> A machine and tooling that has not been maintained will have much worse
> results. Nothing new there.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Datacom - Juliano Ribeiro <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hello to all
>
>
>
> Whats the index acceptable to reject (component pickup error) in the pick
> and place machines?
>
> For example we have 4 NPM-W and today we reject rate is around ~0,03%. Is
> it
> number 0,03 good rate or not? Whats the index PPM to excellent performance
> to pickup in the pick and place machines?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> _____________________________
>
> Juliano Bettim Ribeiro
>
> DATACOM
>
> ENGENHARIA DE PROCESSOS
> Rua América Nº 1000 - Eldorado do Sul - RS CEP: 92990-000
> +55 (51) 8446-2135 <tel:%2B55%20%2851%29%208446-2135>
>
> +55 (51) 3933-3000 <tel:%2B55%20%2851%29%203933-3000>
>
> Ramal: 3484
>  <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]
>  <http://www.datacom.ind.br/> www.datacom.ind.br
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

-- 


This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended 
recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary 
or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, 
dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this 
e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
original. 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2