It appears that EQAB needs to rethink their decision on Doug's submission!
There will be an announcement soon.

Dave

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Lamar,
>
> Excellent!
>
> It all fits perfectly with the element Grouchium (Gm 32.5), and the
> elements effects that Doug detailed.
>
> Drew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lamar Young
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 2:10 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Element Quiz Answer
>
> This all makes sense now.  To me it is obvious what happened.
>
> The Romans would never send out only a couple hundred troops and this is
> what remained after their encounter with Frau Verärgert.
> The troops that did not perish feared that upon returning to Rome, someone
> would leak the truth that they were pummelled by a fraulein, which would
> have meant public execution for all for bringing shame upon the Roman
> empire.  Thus, they sent back only a few of the most trusted men to say
> that they were the only troops remaining after a fierce battle with the
> Hessians, with a warning to not enter that region again - a warning that
> was heeded.
>
> Thus, there was no further push by the Romans to Hesse, and the few
> hundred troops that survived lived in solitude, off the grid, until they
> all died of old age.  This explains why there is very little evidence of
> any Roman existence in Hesse, as well as the apparent conflict - the Romans
> never knew that they occupied an area in Hesse, but the area they did
> occupy was very small and not made public.
>
> Lamar Young
> Specialty Coating Systems, Inc.
> 7645 Woodland Dr.
> Indianapolis, IN 46278
> (317) 244-1200 Ext. 276
> www.scscoatings.com
>
>
>
> From:   David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
> To:     Lamar Young <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc:     TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:   09/25/2015 02:23 PM
> Subject:        Re: [TN] Element Quiz Answer
>
>
>
> Hi Lamar - I can't personally vouch for the EQAB but I believe they try
> their best to be fair. On the other hand, those 7 guys do spend a bunch of
> time underground mining ore so their global perspective could be in
> question.....
>
> Your data would suggest the Roman's did occupy the region and Doug said
> they didn't. Such a data conflict.......
>
> Dave
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Lamar Young <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I'm a bit troubled in that I'm starting to question the accuracy of the
> EQAB, and that perhaps this is personal....
>
> http://romanarc.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> Lamar Young
> Specialty Coating Systems, Inc.
> 7645 Woodland Dr.
> Indianapolis, IN 46278
> (317) 244-1200 Ext. 276
> www.scscoatings.com
>
>
>
> From:        David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
> To:        <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:        09/25/2015 02:12 PM
> Subject:        Re: [TN] Element Quiz Answer
> Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Hi Doug - the EQAB shows you made the following statement ".... In Roman
> times, the Romans found the residents of Hesse to be so disagreeable...."
> which would imply that the Romans occupied the modern day region of Hesse
> and that is their point of dispute. The EQAB research did not find Roman
> occupation (even for a day) of the Hesse province. If you can find someone
> on TechNet in Germany who would refute the EQAB Roman research, then you
> might have a claim.
>
> Wow, its clearly been a stressful week in TechNet land!
>
> Dave
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Douglas Pauls <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Ahhh, I now get to use Dave's disqualification against him.  Yes, the
> > Romans did not go north of the Rhine.  As I said, the Roman maps were
> > marked "Don't Go Here" and the Roman legions would not go near Hesse
> > for the reasons I stated.  That is WHY the Romans did not go north of
> > the
> Rhine.
> >
> > I win I win I win......
> >
> >
> > Doug Pauls
> > Principal Materials and Process Engineer Rockwell Collins
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:52 AM, David Hillman <
> > [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> Here is the Element Quiz Answer:
> >>
> >> The Question:
> >> The name of this element is derived from the Latin name of the German
> >> town/province of Hesse. Which element is being described?
> >>
> >> The Answer:
> >> The element is Hassium (Hs). The element name is derived from the
> >> Latin "Hassias" for the province of Hesse in Germany. The Hs-277
> >> isotope has
> a
> >> half life of 12 minutes and is produced by slamming Fe-58 into Pb-209.
> >>
> >> The winner of the weekly element quiz is Juliano Ribeiro, DATACOM and
> will
> >> get the services of Clumpy and Kloumpios for the week. Juliano's
> response
> >> beat Leland's response by only a couple of seconds per the Rockwell
> >> Collins firewall time stamp so honorable mention goes to Leland too.
> >> Juliano -
> let
> >> me where in Brazil you are located so the Clumpy and Kloumpios can
> begin
> >> their trip.
> >>
> >> The EQAB did review Doug's submission of "Grouchium" and
> >> unfortunately have disqualified his answer (yes, I know that everyone
> >> is stunned by that result). The EQAB review of the Roman
> >> conquest/occupation of Germania revealed that it was primarily south
> >> of the Rhine river with only controversial evidence of any occupation
> >> in the modern province of
> Hesse.
> >>
> >> Note that next week there will be no Elemental Quiz as the SMTAI/IPC
> >> conference/meetings are in Chicago where the boys will be assisting
> Dave &
> >> Doug after traveling to Juliano's facility for a task.
> >>
> >>
> >> So far Clumpy and Kloumpios have done the following:
> >>
> >> Past Quiz winners/tasks:
> >> Week 1 Dick Krug,  Spartan Complex Systems Week 2 Laura Turbini, IRC
> >> Week 3 James Head, Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited Week 3 Pat
> >> Goodyear, PGE Week 4 Joe Russeau, Precision Analysts Laboratory Week
> >> 5 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security Week 6 Steve
> >> Gregory Week 7 Phil Kinner Week 8 Brian Ellis Week 9 James
> >> Head,Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited Week 10 Leland Woodall,
> >> CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 11 Keith Calhoun, Sopark Corp
> >> Week 12 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld-Elektronik Week 13 Leland
> >> Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 14 Brian Ellis
> >> Week 15 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security Week 16 Steve
> >> Gregory Week 17 Phil Kinner Week 18 Ian Braddock, MBDA Systems Week
> >> 19 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 20 Denny Fritz, SAIC
> >> Week 21 Amol Kane
> >> Week 21 Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell
> >> Week 21 David Bealer, Watch Fire Sign Week 22 Phil Kinner Week 23 Guy
> >> Ramsey, RD Circuits Week 24 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger Week 25
> >> Keith Calhoun, SoparkCorp Week 26 Paul Reid, PWB Interconnect
> >> Solutions Inc Week 27 Greg Munie, IPC Week 28 Steve Gregory Week 29
> >> Gus Trakas, Viasystems Week 29 Steve Creswick Week 30 Robert
> >> Welch,Moog Component Group Week 31 Heidi Havelka, Interplex Sunbelt
> >> Week 32 Raye Rivera, Canoga Perkins Week 33 Steve Creswick Week 34
> >> Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell Week 35 Don Vischulis Week 36 Greg Munie,
> >> IPC Week 37 Larry Dzaugis Week 37 Bonus Question Steve Mikell Week 38
> >> Curt McNamara, Logic PD Week 38 Bonus Question Dewey Whittaker,
> >> Honeywell Week 39 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 40 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 40 Ron Feyereisen, Sigmatron Int.
> >> Week 41 Steve Gregory
> >> Week 42 Steve Mikell
> >> Week 43 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger Week 44 Leland Woodall, CSTech
> >> Inc.
> >> Week 44 Eddie Hofer, Rockwell Collins Week 45 Leland Woodall, CSTech
> >> Inc.
> >> Week 46 Joe Russeau, Precision Analysts Laboratory Week 47 Phil
> >> Bavaro,L-3 Communications Week 48 Brian Ellis Week 49 Leland
> >> Woodall,CSTech Week 49 Drew Meyer, Benchmark Electronics Week 50 Greg
> >> Munie, IPC Week 51 Karen Tellefsen.
> >> Week 52 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 53 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 54 Phil Bavaro, L-3 Com.
> >> Week 55 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc. deferred to Richard Stadem, GD,
> >> Week 56 Carl Van Wormer, Cipher Engineering LLC Week 57 Leland
> >> Woodall, CSTech Inc Week 58 Leland Woodall, CSTech, Inc.
> >> Week 58 Bonus Question Robert Wolfe
> >> Week 59 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 60 Graham Collins, Sunsel Systems Week 61 James Head, Crowcon
> >> Detection Instruments Limited Week 62 Leland Woodall Week 62 Brien
> >> Bush, Cirtronics Week 63 Pat Goodyear, PGE Week 64 Ed Popielarski
> >> Week 65 Jim West, N.S. International Week 66 Brian Ellis Week 67
> >> Ravinder Ajmani, HGST Week 68 Robert Wolfe Week 69 Joe Russeau, PAL.
> >> Week 69 Leland Woodall, Keihin North America Week 70 Jim West, N.S.
> >> International Week 71 Steve Gregory Week 72 Bhanu Sood, CALCE Week 72
> >> Ed Popielarsk Week 72 Robert Welch, Moog Component Group Week 73
> >> Torsten Hagge, Kristronics GmbH Week 74 Greg Munie, IPC Week 75 Doug
> >> Pauls, Rockwell Collins Week 76 Graham Collins, Sunsel Systems Week
> >> 77 Robert Kondner, Index Designs Week 77 Bonus Brien Bush, Cirtronics
> >> Week 78 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 79 Denny Fritz, SAIC
> >> Week 80 Brian Ellis
> >> Week 81 Mordechai Kirshenbaum
> >> Week 81 Jim West, N.S. International
> >> Week 82 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc
> >> Week 82 Robert Welch, Moog Components Group Week 83 James Head,
> >> Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited Week 84 Mike Fenner Week 85
> >> Steve Gregory Week 86 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> >> Week 87 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld-Elektronik Week 88 Leland
> >> Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 89 Avni Selim Ozcukurlu, Aselsan Inc.
> >> Week 90 Pat Goodyear, PGE
> >> Week 91 Mordechai Kirshenbaum
> >> Week 92 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 93 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 93 Mike Fenner
> >> Week 94 John Maxwell
> >> Week 95 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 95 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security Week 96 Tom
> >> Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security Week 96 bonus Leland
> >> Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >>
> >> Week 97 Dick Krug, Spartan Brooksville LLC -Clumpy and Kloumpios
> >> arrived late Friday night.  Saturday and Sunday
> we
> >> went to an Oktoberfest.  The boys both complained that the mugs were
> >> so small.  I tried to tell them it's because the beer gets warm
> >> faster in
> the
> >> south. They replied in unison, "Drink faster!"  For being small in
> stature
> >> they can drink a lot.Perhaps because of the beer they weren't good
> >> for much work on Monday, but starting Tuesday they worked hard with
> >> the end of quarter production push. I don't think they like working
> >> this hard.
> >> Clumpy
> >> hoped their next assignment would be far away and they would have to
> leave
> >> early today.
> >>
> >> Week 98 Juliano Ribeiro, DATACOM
> >> -assisted with ????
> >>
> >>
> >> Everyone have a safe week.
> >>
> >> Dave Hillman
> >> Rockwell Collins
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> Data Credit Note: the information in the Element Quizzes is taken
> >> from several published sources including The History and Use of Our
> >> Earth's Chemical Elements by R. Krebs and Nature's Building Blocks by J.
> Emsley.
> >>
> >>
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> _ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> >> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> _
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________