TECHNET Archives

September 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:23:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (281 lines)
Hi Lamar - I can't personally vouch for the EQAB but I believe they try
their best to be fair. On the other hand, those 7 guys do spend a bunch of
time underground mining ore so their global perspective could be in
question.....

Your data would suggest the Roman's did occupy the region and Doug said
they didn't. Such a data conflict.......

Dave

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Lamar Young <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dave,
>
> I'm a bit troubled in that I'm starting to question the accuracy of the
> EQAB, and that perhaps this is personal....
>
> http://romanarc.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> Lamar Young
> Specialty Coating Systems, Inc.
> 7645 Woodland Dr.
> Indianapolis, IN 46278
> (317) 244-1200 Ext. 276
> www.scscoatings.com
>
>
>
> From:        David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
> To:        <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:        09/25/2015 02:12 PM
> Subject:        Re: [TN] Element Quiz Answer
> Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Doug - the EQAB shows you made the following statement ".... In Roman
> times, the Romans found the residents of Hesse to be so disagreeable...."
> which would imply that the Romans occupied the modern day region of Hesse
> and that is their point of dispute. The EQAB research did not find Roman
> occupation (even for a day) of the Hesse province. If you can find someone
> on TechNet in Germany who would refute the EQAB Roman research, then you
> might have a claim.
>
> Wow, its clearly been a stressful week in TechNet land!
>
> Dave
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Douglas Pauls <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Ahhh, I now get to use Dave's disqualification against him.  Yes, the
> > Romans did not go north of the Rhine.  As I said, the Roman maps were
> > marked "Don't Go Here" and the Roman legions would not go near Hesse for
> > the reasons I stated.  That is WHY the Romans did not go north of the
> Rhine.
> >
> > I win I win I win......
> >
> >
> > Doug Pauls
> > Principal Materials and Process Engineer
> > Rockwell Collins
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:52 AM, David Hillman <
> > [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> Here is the Element Quiz Answer:
> >>
> >> The Question:
> >> The name of this element is derived from the Latin name of the German
> >> town/province of Hesse. Which element is being described?
> >>
> >> The Answer:
> >> The element is Hassium (Hs). The element name is derived from the Latin
> >> "Hassias" for the province of Hesse in Germany. The Hs-277 isotope has a
> >> half life of 12 minutes and is produced by slamming Fe-58 into Pb-209.
> >>
> >> The winner of the weekly element quiz is Juliano Ribeiro, DATACOM and
> will
> >> get the services of Clumpy and Kloumpios for the week. Juliano's
> response
> >> beat Leland's response by only a couple of seconds per the Rockwell
> >> Collins
> >> firewall time stamp so honorable mention goes to Leland too. Juliano -
> let
> >> me where in Brazil you are located so the Clumpy and Kloumpios can begin
> >> their trip.
> >>
> >> The EQAB did review Doug's submission of "Grouchium" and unfortunately
> >> have
> >> disqualified his answer (yes, I know that everyone is stunned by that
> >> result). The EQAB review of the Roman conquest/occupation of Germania
> >> revealed that it was primarily south of the Rhine river with only
> >> controversial evidence of any occupation in the modern province of
> Hesse.
> >>
> >> Note that next week there will be no Elemental Quiz as the SMTAI/IPC
> >> conference/meetings are in Chicago where the boys will be assisting
> Dave &
> >> Doug after traveling to Juliano's facility for a task.
> >>
> >>
> >> So far Clumpy and Kloumpios have done the following:
> >>
> >> Past Quiz winners/tasks:
> >> Week 1 Dick Krug,  Spartan Complex Systems
> >> Week 2 Laura Turbini, IRC
> >> Week 3 James Head, Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
> >> Week 3 Pat Goodyear, PGE
> >> Week 4 Joe Russeau, Precision Analysts Laboratory
> >> Week 5 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> >> Week 6 Steve Gregory
> >> Week 7 Phil Kinner
> >> Week 8 Brian Ellis
> >> Week 9 James Head,Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
> >> Week 10 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 11 Keith Calhoun, Sopark Corp
> >> Week 12 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld-Elektronik
> >> Week 13 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 14 Brian Ellis
> >> Week 15 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> >> Week 16 Steve Gregory
> >> Week 17 Phil Kinner
> >> Week 18 Ian Braddock, MBDA Systems
> >> Week 19 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 20 Denny Fritz, SAIC
> >> Week 21 Amol Kane
> >> Week 21 Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell
> >> Week 21 David Bealer, Watch Fire Sign
> >> Week 22 Phil Kinner
> >> Week 23 Guy Ramsey, RD Circuits
> >> Week 24 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger
> >> Week 25 Keith Calhoun, SoparkCorp
> >> Week 26 Paul Reid, PWB Interconnect Solutions Inc
> >> Week 27 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 28 Steve Gregory
> >> Week 29 Gus Trakas, Viasystems
> >> Week 29 Steve Creswick
> >> Week 30 Robert Welch,Moog Component Group
> >> Week 31 Heidi Havelka, Interplex Sunbelt
> >> Week 32 Raye Rivera, Canoga Perkins
> >> Week 33 Steve Creswick
> >> Week 34 Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell
> >> Week 35 Don Vischulis
> >> Week 36 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 37 Larry Dzaugis
> >> Week 37 Bonus Question Steve Mikell
> >> Week 38 Curt McNamara, Logic PD
> >> Week 38 Bonus Question Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell
> >> Week 39 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 40 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 40 Ron Feyereisen, Sigmatron Int.
> >> Week 41 Steve Gregory
> >> Week 42 Steve Mikell
> >> Week 43 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger
> >> Week 44 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 44 Eddie Hofer, Rockwell Collins
> >> Week 45 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 46 Joe Russeau, Precision Analysts Laboratory
> >> Week 47 Phil Bavaro,L-3 Communications
> >> Week 48 Brian Ellis
> >> Week 49 Leland Woodall,CSTech
> >> Week 49 Drew Meyer, Benchmark Electronics
> >> Week 50 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 51 Karen Tellefsen.
> >> Week 52 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 53 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 54 Phil Bavaro, L-3 Com.
> >> Week 55 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc. deferred to Richard Stadem, GD,
> >> Week 56 Carl Van Wormer, Cipher Engineering LLC
> >> Week 57 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc
> >> Week 58 Leland Woodall, CSTech, Inc.
> >> Week 58 Bonus Question Robert Wolfe
> >> Week 59 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 60 Graham Collins, Sunsel Systems
> >> Week 61 James Head, Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
> >> Week 62 Leland Woodall
> >> Week 62 Brien Bush, Cirtronics
> >> Week 63 Pat Goodyear, PGE
> >> Week 64 Ed Popielarski
> >> Week 65 Jim West, N.S. International
> >> Week 66 Brian Ellis
> >> Week 67 Ravinder Ajmani, HGST
> >> Week 68 Robert Wolfe
> >> Week 69 Joe Russeau, PAL.
> >> Week 69 Leland Woodall, Keihin North America
> >> Week 70 Jim West, N.S. International
> >> Week 71 Steve Gregory
> >> Week 72 Bhanu Sood, CALCE
> >> Week 72 Ed Popielarsk
> >> Week 72 Robert Welch, Moog Component Group
> >> Week 73 Torsten Hagge, Kristronics GmbH
> >> Week 74 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 75 Doug Pauls, Rockwell Collins
> >> Week 76 Graham Collins, Sunsel Systems
> >> Week 77 Robert Kondner, Index Designs
> >> Week 77 Bonus Brien Bush, Cirtronics
> >> Week 78 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 79 Denny Fritz, SAIC
> >> Week 80 Brian Ellis
> >> Week 81 Mordechai Kirshenbaum
> >> Week 81 Jim West, N.S. International
> >> Week 82 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc
> >> Week 82 Robert Welch, Moog Components Group
> >> Week 83 James Head, Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
> >> Week 84 Mike Fenner
> >> Week 85 Steve Gregory
> >> Week 86 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> >> Week 87 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld-Elektronik
> >> Week 88 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 89 Avni Selim Ozcukurlu, Aselsan Inc.
> >> Week 90 Pat Goodyear, PGE
> >> Week 91 Mordechai Kirshenbaum
> >> Week 92 Greg Munie, IPC
> >> Week 93 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 93 Mike Fenner
> >> Week 94 John Maxwell
> >> Week 95 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >> Week 95 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> >> Week 96 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> >> Week 96 bonus Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> >>
> >> Week 97 Dick Krug, Spartan Brooksville LLC
> >> -Clumpy and Kloumpios arrived late Friday night.  Saturday and Sunday we
> >> went to an Oktoberfest.  The boys both complained that the mugs were so
> >> small.  I tried to tell them it's because the beer gets warm faster in
> the
> >> south. They replied in unison, "Drink faster!"  For being small in
> stature
> >> they can drink a lot.Perhaps because of the beer they weren't good for
> >> much
> >> work on Monday, but starting Tuesday they worked hard with the end of
> >> quarter production push. I don't think they like working this hard.
> >> Clumpy
> >> hoped their next assignment would be far away and they would have to
> leave
> >> early today.
> >>
> >> Week 98 Juliano Ribeiro, DATACOM
> >> -assisted with ????
> >>
> >>
> >> Everyone have a safe week.
> >>
> >> Dave Hillman
> >> Rockwell Collins
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> Data Credit Note: the information in the Element Quizzes is taken from
> >> several published sources including The History and Use of Our Earth's
> >> Chemical Elements by R. Krebs and Nature's Building Blocks by J. Emsley.
> >>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> >> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2