TECHNET Archives

September 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:06:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (233 lines)
Hi Joe - the EQAB disqualification was that the "proof" that the Romans
actually occupied the modern day region of Hesse Germany is a point of
dispute. Research by EQAB revealed that the northern edge of the Roman
occupation of Germany was the Rhine river, the province of Hesse is
considerably farther North of the river. Heaven forbid if the EQAB would
intentionally disqualify Doug's answer.

Dave

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:44 PM, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dave,
>
> On behalf of Doug, I have to cry foul.  Normally I would stay out of it,
> but the disqualification this week just seems weird, even for a Friday.
>
> You state as the basis for the EQAB disqualification that "The EQAB review
> of the Roman conquest/occupation of Germania revealed that it was primarily
> south of the Rhine river with only controversial evidence of any occupation
> in the modern province of Hesse."  This seems to support Doug's comment
> about "don't go here", which might explain why the evidence for the Roman
> occupation of Hesse is controversial.  Romans didn't like to go there.
>
> Doug stated,  "In Roman times, the Romans found the residents of Hesse to
> be so disagreeable they termed them “inritatior hominis”, and the town on
> Roman maps simply labelled as Inritatior with a notation “Etnon egredieris
> inde huc” (don’t go here)."
>
> While Doug might have legitimately been disqualified for the Rockwell
> timestamp thingy, disqualifying the man by supporting his answer just seems
> to me like a personal disqualification rather than a fact disqualification.
> It might just be me though, it is Friday after all.
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe Russeau
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: David Hillman
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:52 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Element Quiz Answer
>
> Here is the Element Quiz Answer:
>
> The Question:
> The name of this element is derived from the Latin name of the German
> town/province of Hesse. Which element is being described?
>
> The Answer:
> The element is Hassium (Hs). The element name is derived from the Latin
> "Hassias" for the province of Hesse in Germany. The Hs-277 isotope has a
> half life of 12 minutes and is produced by slamming Fe-58 into Pb-209.
>
> The winner of the weekly element quiz is Juliano Ribeiro, DATACOM and will
> get the services of Clumpy and Kloumpios for the week. Juliano's response
> beat Leland's response by only a couple of seconds per the Rockwell Collins
> firewall time stamp so honorable mention goes to Leland too. Juliano - let
> me where in Brazil you are located so the Clumpy and Kloumpios can begin
> their trip.
>
> The EQAB did review Doug's submission of "Grouchium" and unfortunately have
> disqualified his answer (yes, I know that everyone is stunned by that
> result). The EQAB review of the Roman conquest/occupation of Germania
> revealed that it was primarily south of the Rhine river with only
> controversial evidence of any occupation in the modern province of Hesse.
>
> Note that next week there will be no Elemental Quiz as the SMTAI/IPC
> conference/meetings are in Chicago where the boys will be assisting Dave &
> Doug after traveling to Juliano's facility for a task.
>
>
> So far Clumpy and Kloumpios have done the following:
>
> Past Quiz winners/tasks:
> Week 1 Dick Krug,  Spartan Complex Systems
> Week 2 Laura Turbini, IRC
> Week 3 James Head, Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
> Week 3 Pat Goodyear, PGE
> Week 4 Joe Russeau, Precision Analysts Laboratory
> Week 5 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> Week 6 Steve Gregory
> Week 7 Phil Kinner
> Week 8 Brian Ellis
> Week 9 James Head,Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
> Week 10 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 11 Keith Calhoun, Sopark Corp
> Week 12 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld-Elektronik
> Week 13 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 14 Brian Ellis
> Week 15 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> Week 16 Steve Gregory
> Week 17 Phil Kinner
> Week 18 Ian Braddock, MBDA Systems
> Week 19 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 20 Denny Fritz, SAIC
> Week 21 Amol Kane
> Week 21 Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell
> Week 21 David Bealer, Watch Fire Sign
> Week 22 Phil Kinner
> Week 23 Guy Ramsey, RD Circuits
> Week 24 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger
> Week 25 Keith Calhoun, SoparkCorp
> Week 26 Paul Reid, PWB Interconnect Solutions Inc
> Week 27 Greg Munie, IPC
> Week 28 Steve Gregory
> Week 29 Gus Trakas, Viasystems
> Week 29 Steve Creswick
> Week 30 Robert Welch,Moog Component Group
> Week 31 Heidi Havelka, Interplex Sunbelt
> Week 32 Raye Rivera, Canoga Perkins
> Week 33 Steve Creswick
> Week 34 Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell
> Week 35 Don Vischulis
> Week 36 Greg Munie, IPC
> Week 37 Larry Dzaugis
> Week 37 Bonus Question Steve Mikell
> Week 38 Curt McNamara, Logic PD
> Week 38 Bonus Question Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell
> Week 39 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 40 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 40 Ron Feyereisen, Sigmatron Int.
> Week 41 Steve Gregory
> Week 42 Steve Mikell
> Week 43 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger
> Week 44 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 44 Eddie Hofer, Rockwell Collins
> Week 45 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 46 Joe Russeau, Precision Analysts Laboratory
> Week 47 Phil Bavaro,L-3 Communications
> Week 48 Brian Ellis
> Week 49 Leland Woodall,CSTech
> Week 49 Drew Meyer, Benchmark Electronics
> Week 50 Greg Munie, IPC
> Week 51 Karen Tellefsen.
> Week 52 Greg Munie, IPC
> Week 53 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 54 Phil Bavaro, L-3 Com.
> Week 55 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc. deferred to Richard Stadem, GD,
> Week 56 Carl Van Wormer, Cipher Engineering LLC
> Week 57 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc
> Week 58 Leland Woodall, CSTech, Inc.
> Week 58 Bonus Question Robert Wolfe
> Week 59 Greg Munie, IPC
> Week 60 Graham Collins, Sunsel Systems
> Week 61 James Head, Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
> Week 62 Leland Woodall
> Week 62 Brien Bush, Cirtronics
> Week 63 Pat Goodyear, PGE
> Week 64 Ed Popielarski
> Week 65 Jim West, N.S. International
> Week 66 Brian Ellis
> Week 67 Ravinder Ajmani, HGST
> Week 68 Robert Wolfe
> Week 69 Joe Russeau, PAL.
> Week 69 Leland Woodall, Keihin North America
> Week 70 Jim West, N.S. International
> Week 71 Steve Gregory
> Week 72 Bhanu Sood, CALCE
> Week 72 Ed Popielarsk
> Week 72 Robert Welch, Moog Component Group
> Week 73 Torsten Hagge, Kristronics GmbH
> Week 74 Greg Munie, IPC
> Week 75 Doug Pauls, Rockwell Collins
> Week 76 Graham Collins, Sunsel Systems
> Week 77 Robert Kondner, Index Designs
> Week 77 Bonus Brien Bush, Cirtronics
> Week 78 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 79 Denny Fritz, SAIC
> Week 80 Brian Ellis
> Week 81 Mordechai Kirshenbaum
> Week 81 Jim West, N.S. International
> Week 82 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc
> Week 82 Robert Welch, Moog Components Group
> Week 83 James Head, Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
> Week 84 Mike Fenner
> Week 85 Steve Gregory
> Week 86 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> Week 87 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld-Elektronik
> Week 88 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 89 Avni Selim Ozcukurlu, Aselsan Inc.
> Week 90 Pat Goodyear, PGE
> Week 91 Mordechai Kirshenbaum
> Week 92 Greg Munie, IPC
> Week 93 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 93 Mike Fenner
> Week 94 John Maxwell
> Week 95 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
> Week 95 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> Week 96 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security
> Week 96 bonus Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
>
> Week 97 Dick Krug, Spartan Brooksville LLC
> -Clumpy and Kloumpios arrived late Friday night.  Saturday and Sunday we
> went to an Oktoberfest.  The boys both complained that the mugs were so
> small.  I tried to tell them it's because the beer gets warm faster in the
> south. They replied in unison, "Drink faster!"  For being small in stature
> they can drink a lot.Perhaps because of the beer they weren't good for much
> work on Monday, but starting Tuesday they worked hard with the end of
> quarter production push. I don't think they like working this hard.  Clumpy
> hoped their next assignment would be far away and they would have to leave
> early today.
>
> Week 98 Juliano Ribeiro, DATACOM
> -assisted with ????
>
>
> Everyone have a safe week.
>
> Dave Hillman
> Rockwell Collins
> [log in to unmask]
> Data Credit Note: the information in the Element Quizzes is taken from
> several published sources including The History and Use of Our Earth's
> Chemical Elements by R. Krebs and Nature's Building Blocks by J. Emsley.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2