TECHNET Archives

September 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:18:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
The reason I asked was because three different individuals, with their experience, had different interpretations of the written text.   At least now all have heard and read the same the same thing.

Victor,

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brian Ellis
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:38 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Supported & Unsupported holes

Well, I guess you now have the TechNet support with the hole answer!

Brian

On 21/09/2015 22:45, McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A wrote:
> Supported Hole = land and barrel plating Unsupported Hole = land only
> Un-plated hole = no land or barrel plating (usually secondary drilling
> process)
>
>
> Jeffrey McGlaughlin, C.I.D.
> Engineering Designer
>
> Battelle
> 505 King Avenue
> Columbus Ohio 43201-2693
> [log in to unmask]
>
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication or its substance is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return to the sender and delete from your computer system.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Victor Hernandez
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 3:30 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] FW: Supported & Unsupported holes
>
> I did not received any responses, so decide to re-submit.
>
> Victor,
>
> From: Hernandez, Victor G
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 9:14 AM
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
> Cc: Hernandez, Victor G
> Subject: Supported & Unsupported holes
>
> Fellow TechNetters:
>
> Is it safe to stated that a SUPPORTED hole contains a plated through BARREL and an UNSUPPORTED holes does not contain a plated through BARREL... I am measuring the hole break out on an external PTH annular ring. IPC-2221 Figure 9-2 & Table 9-2.
>
> Victor,
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2