TECHNET Archives

September 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Kelly <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steven Kelly <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:36:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hi Victor,
An unsupported does not have plating - this is all defined in IPC-T-50.
Regards Steve Kelly

On 2015-09-21, 3:29 PM, "Victor Hernandez" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>I did not received any responses, so decide to re-submit.
>
>Victor,
>
>From: Hernandez, Victor G
>Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 9:14 AM
>To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
>Cc: Hernandez, Victor G
>Subject: Supported & Unsupported holes
>
>Fellow TechNetters:
>
>   Is it safe to stated that a SUPPORTED hole contains a plated through
>BARREL and an UNSUPPORTED holes does not contain a plated through
>BARREL...   I am measuring the hole break out on an external PTH annular
>ring.   IPC-2221  Figure 9-2 & Table 9-2.
>
>Victor,
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2