 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:41:42 +0000 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Message-ID: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
base64 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
For board design/layout, should one expect a significant increase in required layout lead times when specifying fabrication to 6012C Class 3/A, as opposed to Class 3 ?? I can understand that a layout to Class 3 would take longer to obtain, over the same board laid out to Class 2; but from 3 to 3/A should one expect an order of magnitude increase in the time it takes to do a layout ??? What about 6012B (which has a 2 mil min internal annular ring requirement for 3/A) ?? I’m thinking not, but I just want to validate that.
José (Joey) Ríos, Sr QA Engineer
Mission Assurance
Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Research
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
(617)324-6272
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0.
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
