TECHNET Archives

July 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:37:01 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I agree with your approach; it is a good practice.
Our customers ARE the DoD types on the nuclear missile, land warrior, and various other military avionics and space projects, and they are indeed, VERY conservative, I can guarantee you that! And rightly so.
I have a very strong negative feeling about the use of bismuth in any high-reliability soldering application, to be honest. One simply cannot ensure there is never more than is intended, and the total mix is always anybody’s guess.

From: Dennis Fritz [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 9:07 AM
To: Stadem, Richard D.; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Dave is famous!

Dean, I think we are in violent agreement.  You said "any Pb-free
solder on the replacement part termination is less than 1% or 2% of the final
solder joint" and I said "carefully de-soldered and care used
to remove as much Pb-free solder as possible"

I am sure on the NASA/DoD repair work done on by the military, the component was removed carefully and the solder wicked from the original joint . Then, the 2M repair procedure wets the attachment site with eutectic and that is wicked off.  Finally, the good component is attached with eutectic.

My analogy is double dipping component leads to replace either gold or pure tin finish with eutectic.

I am open to further discussion of Pb-free finishes containing bismuth, and being reworked with eutectic.  I know Hillman and others have said it is fine - not enough bismuth left to intermetallic with Pb for low melting/weak intermetallics.  BUT, is anyone reworking lead-free bismuth with eutectic on a daily basis?   DoD types are VERY conservative.

Denny Fritz




-----Original Message-----
From: Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>; Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Sent: Fri, Jul 24, 2015 7:39 am
Subject: RE: [TN] Dave is famous!

I agree with you Denny, but I would change that to say, so long as any Pb-free

solder on the replacement part termination is less than 1% or 2% of the final

solder joint. That way you never need worry about the non-homogenous lead-rich

areas in the final solder joint, which Dave has taught us is what leads to

issues and typically only occurs in BGA or CSP ball solder joints.

Otherwise,

component termination SOLDER finishes that are lead-free are (usually) fully

compatible with Sn63 solder from either an assembly or rework standpoint, except

for possibly the tin-whisker issue that could affect the portion of the

termination NOT soldered with lead solder. Of course, this does not apply to any

non-solder termination finish, such as gold, which we know should be removed

prior to assembly.



Regarding Famous Dave, I would go so far as to simply

state his contributions to the electronics industry are so prevalent (and so

well-presented) that I consider him to be part of an elite group that includes

pioneers with names such as Englemaier, Lau, Hwang, Shangguan, Handwerker,

Pecht, Liu, Fjelstad, Turbini  and a few others whose work has greatly

contributed to reliability in electronics, especially in the face of

RoHS.



Dean



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet

[mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Dennis Fritz

Sent: Thursday, July 23,

2015 8:10 PM

To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: [TN] Dave is famous!



Thanks

Dave, from the other members of the NASA/DoD consortium, for sharing the fame.





The first two rounds of the NASA testing included some rework, especially

the Round Two.  There, the military, focused on the Navy 2M repair group, wanted

to know what reliability effect occurs if Pb-free solder is repaired with

eutectic.  So far, Defense has allowed only eutectic solder at their repair

stations because typical DoD repair technicians have little practical way of

determining whether the assemblies are Pb-free (mostly from COTS) or is they are

assembled with original eutectic solder.  There are no XRF machines on ships and

very few at depots.



So, if boards are carefully de-soldered and care used

to remove as much Pb-free solder as possible, and eutectic is used to solder in

new components - is there reliability loss?



The answer - very little

reliability is lost, so long as the repair is done carefully and to specified

procedure.



Denny Fritz





-----Original Message-----

From: David

Hillman <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

To: TechNet

<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Sent: Thu, Jul 23, 2015 6:36 pm

Subject: Re: [TN] Dave is

famous!





Hi Drew - thanks for the kind words. The Technet community gets the

same credit for all of the great support and communication of information

sources that makes our jobs easier. Here is the web link to the investigation I

think Phil and Jim

were

discussing:

http://teerm.nasa.gov/nasa_dodleadfreeelectronics_proj2.htm



The

NASA

DoD Phase 2 was a great consortium project with lots of hard working folks doing

cool things.



Dave



On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Drew meyer

<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:



> Gentlemen.  Thanks for the notification

of

Dave's work!

>

> Thank you Dave for all your input through Technet

and

published data.  You

> help all of us face the issues of PCB manufacturing

at

one time or

> another.  Thanks for all the hard earned knowledge

shared!

>

>

Drew

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: TechNet

[mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]

On Behalf Of Ed Popielarski

> Sent: Thursday, July

23, 2015 12:26 PM

> To:

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

> Subject: [TN] Dave is famous!

>

>

Dave Hillman was

mentioned in a widely distributed article

today!

>

>

http://www.circuitinsight.com/programs/51504.html

>

> "I would

like to point

out that the consortium for the aerospace and

> military people,

which our good

friend, Dave Hillman has produced some of

> the best, most

comprehensive test

data... Dave, if we're wrong, please

> contact us. But the

point is this is the

only known published data

> comparing un-repaired boards

with repaired boards

that I know of."

>

> Ed Popielarski

> Engineering

Manager

>

>

[cid:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]

>

970 NE

21st Ct.

>                               Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

>

>



Ph: 360-675-1322

>                               Fx: 206-624-0695

>



Cl: 949-581-6601

>

>

>

>        "It's one kind of victory to slay a

beast,

move a mountain, and

> cross a chasm, but it's another kind altogether

to

realize that the beast,

> the mountain, and the chasm were of your

own

design."

>

>

https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A

>

>

>

______________________________________________________________________

>

This

email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

>

For more

information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

>

______________________________________________________________________

>

>

______________________________________________________________________

>

This

email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

>

For more

information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

>

______________________________________________________________________

>





______________________________________________________________________

This

email

has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For

more

information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>



______________________________________________________________________











______________________________________________________________________

This

email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more

information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2