TECHNET Archives

July 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
PWB Inner layer Misregistration
From:
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:44:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Fellow TechNetters:

   Is there a correlation between PWB inner layer misregistration and reliability?   What is IPC guidelines numerical value with regards to inner layer misregistration hole breakout of signal capture pad (s)?   I always hear of +/- 3 mils for all processes in the PWB process.

Victor,


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2