TECHNET Archives

July 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, James <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:02:30 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
It is clearly rejectable and the vias are full of nodules and bad plating. 
They will probably open during assembly. 
Contamination on the surface in this magnitude is definitely indicative of a process problem and the chance of the contamination being in the holes is high 

James Hofer
General Manager
Accurate Circuit Engineering (ACE)
3019 S. Kilson Dr.
Santa Ana CA 92707-4202
[log in to unmask]
(714) 546-2162 wk
(714) 473-6127 cell
AS9100C / ITAR
ISO9001
MIL-PRF-31032 and 55110
Follow us on Facebook!
 


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] MYSTRY DEFECT

Some kind of weird pattern plating process defect?

Light makes all defects of this type LOOK huge. IF the plating where the defects are is thinner than your specification for surface plating thickness, then it's rejectable. Measuring is easiest with a high resolution (>200X) optical microscope with a calibrated focus height readout. If used by a skilled operator, you can get a resolution of 3 microns or even a little better. If that's not good enough, you need to section and probably use SEM.

Wayne

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 10:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] MYSTRY DEFECT

Hi Ong Seet Leng,

I got your photos and have them posted now, the links are here:

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Mystery_Defect_1.jpg

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Mystery_Defect_2.jpg

Looks like there was some sort of problem with the etch resist, can't say exactly what that was though. I definitely would be kicking these back to the vendor!

Steve

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Ong Seet Leng <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Afternoon,
>
> I had checked a bare printed wiring board and attached a photograph on 
> one of the defect found. I would like to seek advice from you gurus'
> out there on what to call this defect? For the life of me, I can't 
> find the definition of it. Appreciate if someone can guide me. Thanks 
> in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Ong Seet Leng
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

-- 


This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended
recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2