TECHNET Archives

June 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lee Hitchens <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Lee Hitchens <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:08:24 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (102 lines)
Another point is they tend to see more than you want to know about. There
is CC software out there that literally inspects to IPC standards and is
better at it than the operators.

What I mean is if they have line of sight they will see defects. Bubbles,
de-wetting etc. Even if your operators cant!

This means it can be like opening Pandorašs box. Suddenly, you are in a
position where you donšt know what to accept and what not to pass.

Tan also makes a great point on materials. Silicones for example generally
donšt have a great UV fluorescence and can really fool a system. Then you
have the semi transparent nature of the coating interacting with the
colours below the surface. This can also cause problems.

What it really comes down to is some really intense programming to ensure
you minimise the false readings. Do that and you can see a 90% of what
operators do and it works on most PCBs.

A final point is that it also depends on the method of application. If you
are using a selective robot then they are excellent 99 times out of a 100.
After all the robot is spraying line of sight so the system can see it.
You start spraying 3D or dipping and want the system to inspect and Ioan
is right. You need a lot of cameras to do the job!


Best Regards

Dr Lee Hitchens

SCH Technologies is a Division of SCH Services Limited
Mob: +44 (0) 7862 25 33 21
www.conformalcoating.co.uk <http://www.conformalcoating.co.uk/>
 
TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE
 
SCH Services Ltd offers a Technical Support Helpline to help address all
issues relating to reliability. This includes contamination testing,
cleanliness and cleaning issues, plus any coating related questions.
Please contact us via email or telephone:
 
[log in to unmask]   +44 (0)1226 249019 (office hours & answerphone)
+44 (0)7862 253321(out-of-hours emergency)

The opinions expressed in this e-mail are strictly those of the sender and
not of SCH Services Limited. This communication may contain information
which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive
use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure
of any of it may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient(s)
please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or
the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (+44
(0)1226 249019) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. Virus
Warning - Although steps have been taken to ensure that all email and
attachments are virus-free, we cannot guarantee nor be held liable.
 
Company Registration: 04043334
Registered office: SCH Services Limited Newburgh Building McLintock Way
Barnsley South Yorkshire S70 6BF







On 03/06/2015 20:27, "Richard Kraszewski" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>Would anyone like to share their thoughts on automated coating inspection?
>The good, the bad and or the ugly.
>
>Initial  experience that I have had with them leaves me with the
>impression  that:
>
>	> That are useful to indicate if there is complete lack of coating  on a
>PCA or some specific PCA regions.
>	> can indicate if there is sizable (ytbd)  violation of a keep out zone.
>	> not the best to verify  coverage on some items  such as fine pitch QFP
>leads or  other small SM type components
>	>  except for the case of select spots on a PCA also not the best to use
>as general tool to locate thick fillets or thin coatings on a PCA
>
>As I said above, any thoughts (profound, rants or other) on this matter
>would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>
>Rich Kraszewski /PLEXUS
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2