TECHNET Archives

June 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:27:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Hi Bob - we routinely use the dippable paste for BGA and CSP rework with
great success. However, our efforts on QFPs have not been as successful.
The technique has worked successfully for the larger pitch QFPs  but on the
fin pitch QFPs we have had significant bridging issues.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Bob Wettermann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi All:
>
> We have a project where we need to rework 10's of thousands of LQFP
> 100/0.5mm pitch devices. All options are being considered.
>
> Since the PoP dipping pastes have come in to their own has anyone tried
> using these pastes to dip for fine pitch rework?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Bob Wettermann
> BEST Inc
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2