TECHNET Archives

May 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 May 2015 15:08:50 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
Hi John-

Are you talking about independent static protect IC's, such as implemented
on USB and other frequently mated interfaces? 

If not, this is a semiconductor diode which should never get forward biased,
and the reverse bias will be a small fraction of its breakdown voltage.
Under these assumptions, the static protection diodes will work fine long
after what they are protecting has failed. If you don't start with those
assumptions, then you are talking about damage during a protection event.
That is significantly more interesting, but would require you to get
statistics on the protection events, meaning they are part of your typical
usage environment. That seems weird unless you're talking about specific
protection devices as noted above.

For specifically designed protective devices, I'm sure the manufacturers
should be able to guide you on what the expected lifetime is in a certain
"dirty" usage environment. Or you could simply repetitively do the
overvoltage until the device you're interested in fails. There are several
different models for static discharges for this kind of application, and
they are well publicized.

Wayne  

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nieznanski, John A -
Exelis
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 6:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Accelerated Life Tests for ESD diodes?

Hello Tech-Net!

I was just starting a literature search on the topic of Accelerated Life
Testing for CMOS ESD diodes. Has anyone seen any results from this type of
testing, either successful or unsuccessful? I'd like to start by getting a
good handle on the relevant failure modes.

Thanks!

John Nieznanski

________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the
sender. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Exelis
Inc. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. Exelis Inc. accepts no liability for any damage caused
by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2