TECHNET Archives

April 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:55:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (97 lines)
not sure how to answer: wire density is low, wire bonder unknown, wire
type unknown, substrate finishing = major factor to your success of yield
if your vendor is new, your yield is low.  Better find someone done it
before to get estimate (they possibly still need hands on try it out to
get gut feeling of pie in the sky number).  my 1.6 cents. the rest is
process control and managing your vendor.  If you have deep pocket with a
latest wire bonding machine, you might be looking at good yield (>99.9 as
per wire basis).
               jk
> Steve,
>
> Real quick and not necessarily too in-depth at this time, but for COB I
> consider the following
>
> 1 - cost of die/assembly
> 2 - rework permitted/desired?
>
> A great deal goes in to the board plating and quality.  Likely more effort
> is expended on consistent and quality plating than is required for bonding
> development.
>
> Assuming no rework (low cost die and boards), one bad wire out of 32 would
> take you to a 97% yield... but this obviously isn't good enough.
>
> Personally, I tend to be quite conservative - I was originally going to
> say to you that below 98% you should be jumping up and down screaming.
> Below 99%, you should be asking a lot of questions.  I'm more into the PPM
> line of thought when it comes to wire bonding, but a great deal hinges on
> the cost of the product, and the application.... so you can best allocate
> your resources.
>
> Watch your glob-topping, or dam and fill process (as well as materials) so
> as to not further decimate your yields.
>
>
> Steve Creswick
> Engineering
> Barnett Manufacturing – Evans Machinery Co.
> 11441 East Lakewood Blvd
> Holland, MI  49424
> Ph  616 546 8225
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Hackney
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 7:28 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Wire Bond Process Yield Rates
>
> I would like to get a sense of the process yield rates that should be
> expected for COB processes. Apologies if this is a duplicate of previous
> discussions, but I could not find anything directly on this topic.
>
> I understand that process yields are going to be affected by a LOT of
> variables. Also, I buy into the idea that there is no such thing as
> “good enough” and that continuous improvement should never stop.
>
> Having said that, I am really just looking for a very rough reference so
> that I can get a more objective evaluation of my bonding operation
> performance.
>
> Some rough description of the process and products:
>
> •	Pretty good productd volume: ranging from 300k annual to 1500k annual
> per product.
> •	One or two die per PCBA.
> •	Bonds per die fairly low: range between 12 wires and 20 wires per die.
> •	All die 100% flying probe tested prior to sawing, with 100% visual
> inspection after sawing.
>
> Our volumes are high enough and product life long enough that we can
> afford to invest in changes to the product to improve productivity and
> yield.
>
> My questions are along the lines of these: What sort of yield would make
> you think to yourself “Yeah, that’s not fantastic, but it’s not too
> bad either.”? What target would you be trying to shoot for?
>
> Any questions or comments welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Hackney
> Toronto, Canada
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2