TECHNET Archives

March 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:47:57 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
The original source manufacturer had occasional internal cleanliness problems.  With much effort, I finally captured an intermittent open circuit problem, finding a small speck of dust (similar to the plastic case material) that had worked its way between the normally closed contacts.  This was on one of several units that had come to us as field failures with no problem found during testing.  Since I didn't like these relays for this internal cleanliness problem, I was happy to get some of the other relays at a lower cost and a much better lead time.  

The original relays (10k used) never had a water incursion problem.

Later,
Carl



Carl B. Van Wormer, P.E., AE7GD
Senior Hardware Engineer
Cipher Engineering LLC
    21195 NW Evergreen Pkwy Ste 209
    Hillsboro, OR  97124-7167
    503-617-7447x303
    [log in to unmask]     http://cipherengineering.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Nutting, Phil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:22 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Carl VanWormer
Subject: RE: Sealed relays fail after water wash

Carl,

I'm assuming nothing else in the process changed.  What happens if you go back to the original manufacturer?

Phil Nutting

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Carl VanWormer
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:40 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Sealed relays fail after water wash

Here is the first of two stories about recent relay failures caused by our assembly process:

We have been selling an assembly that has 16 through-hole relays on 4-layer FR-4 boards.  Our CM runs these boards through a wave soldering process, using water-clean flux, and then washes the boards in a dishwasher using the local water (quite pure).  We changed to a different (pin compatible, customer approved) relay source for the last batch of 100 boards, and then suffered some production test fallouts.  Upon analysis of the failed boards, the relays seemed to be the cause.  With a little more work, I discovered water inside the sealed relay packages.

We are using a subminiature power relay that states "Epoxy sealed for automatic wave soldering" as one of the bulleted features on the datasheet.  I found another document on the vendor's website titled "Relay Technical Notes", which covered cleaning, mentioning "Sealed relays can be safely cleaned by immersion."  We sent several failed relays to the vendor for analysis.  From their response, we learned more about the relay manufacturing process, which includes a vent hole that allows for outgassing.  The last step in the relay assembly process fills the vent hole depression with a clear UV cure epoxy, followed by UV exposure to cure the epoxy, sealing the relay.  Their failure analysis report indicated that the relay seals had been compromised.

We are assuming that the epoxy seals (on the bottom of the relays) failed during our product assembly process (in either the wave soldering, or the washing processes), compromising the integrity of the seal.  Our guess is that the epoxy didn't bond well to the relay vent hole (pick any reason you like).  If the broken seal allows the internal heated air to escape while the wash water is under the relay, when the air inside the relay cools, water may be sucked into the relay.  This sequence of events would explain the water discovered inside of relays that had failed our final assembly testing.

To avoid field failures on the current batch of units, we decided to remove all potentially damaged relays, replacing them with new parts (without a final wash).  Analysis of the removed relays showed about half of the parts had visibly defective seals, with several showing the vent plugs almost all the way out of the vent.  (pictures available if there is interest and Steve will host them)

Since the vendor says we are doing something wrong to break the vent seals, we have decided to avoid the problem for any future units.  We now add the relays after the initial board wash, using hand soldering with no-clean solder.

Our conclusion: don't wash relays, regardless of the datasheet information.

Later,
Carl

p.s.  another relay story will follow . . .









Carl B. Van Wormer, P.E., AE7GD
Senior Hardware Engineer
Cipher Engineering LLC
    21195 NW Evergreen Pkwy Ste 209
    Hillsboro, OR  97124-7167
    503-617-7447x303
    [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>     http://cipherengineering.com<http://cipherengineering.com/>

This message may contain confidential and/or proprietary information, and is intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed. Any use by others is strictly prohibited.  If I sent this to you by mistake, please be nice and delete it, and then tell me of my mistake so I can send it to the right person.



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2