Hi James - the EQAB would like to thank you and Anne-Sophie for providing
additional rationale for the disqualification of Doug's Nutzium submission.
I am sure Doug will appreciate the independent and unbiased
disqualification of this submission. EQAB would like to provide you a
beverage of your choice the next time we are at a conference together to
compensate you for your efforts (gee, that almost sounded like a pay-off).

Dave

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:26 AM, James Head <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Anne-Sophie tells me that the EQAB could have saved the time looking into
> spectra response by looking at the "Eka" part of the clue as Nutzium would
> have to be Ardha-daxinataha-Mercury following Mendeleev's style of
> provisional names for predicted elements.  Sorry Doug.
>
> James
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________