TECHNET Archives

January 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:08:19 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Third Time is a charm!!!!!!

From: Hernandez, Victor G
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 2:51 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
Cc: Hernandez, Victor G
Subject: Ceramic resistor pack, RPac

Fellow TechNetters:

   I didn't get a response the first time, so I posted the second time.

Would the ceramic Rpac performance be compromised if installed with the carbon ink touching/facing toward the PWB solder mask surface.?   I have always seen these SMT facing up/away from the solder mask surface.

Victor,

From: Hernandez, Victor G
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 12:48 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
Cc: Hernandez, Victor G
Subject: Ceramic resistor pack, RPac

Fellow TechNetters:

   Would the ceramic Rpac performance be compromised if installed with the carbon ink touching/facing the PWB solder mask surface.?   I have always seen these SMT facing up/away from the solder mask surface.

Victor,


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2