TECHNET Archives

December 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Dec 2014 17:27:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
ask your part vendor.  they know the internal structure and cap wafer  
based on the design tolerance... no body else can tell you better  
than your vendor.  remember, the wlp usually use single crystal as  
cap, if you have crack/chip, depend upon the stress level during your  
process and user environment, it might propagate.  my 2 cents.
       jk

On Dec 23, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Evamaria Jones wrote:

> Does anyone know of acceptability requirements regarding chipped /  
> component damage on chip scale and wafer level packages? How much  
> chipping of edges are acceptable on the exposed silicone  
> die? ...and can minor chipping of the silicon substrate cause  
> performance problems? Is the silicon die considered the component  
> substrate or package? IPC-A-610E, 9.3 states that chipped or  
> cracked component substrate constitute a defect. Clearly a crack or  
> chip that extends from top to bottom would be defect. Would 1/4mm  
> chip on top be a defect. Any guidance would be appreciated.
> Eva J


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2