TECHNET Archives

December 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Syed Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:53:34 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Silicon is brittle and fragile so dicing can easily cause chipping and cracking.  Information in MIL-STD-883G METHOD 2010.1.1 starting from 3.1.3 and other similar specifications have defined inspection and rejection criteria. Some of these documents are available to download free online.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Evamaria Jones
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 11:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Wafer level package or Chip scale package component damage

Does anyone know of acceptability requirements regarding chipped / component damage on chip scale and wafer level packages? How much chipping of edges are acceptable on the exposed silicone die? ...and can minor chipping of the silicon substrate cause performance problems? Is the silicon die considered the component substrate or package? IPC-A-610E, 9.3 states that chipped or cracked component substrate constitute a defect. Clearly a crack or chip that extends from top to bottom would be defect. Would 1/4mm chip on top be a defect. Any guidance would be appreciated.
Eva J

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2