TECHNET Archives

September 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:50:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Fellow TechNetters:

   I did not receive a reply so I posted my inquiry again.   It's Monday so things might be slow!  I did review IPC-2221B Table 6-1   Electrical; Conductor Spacing.   I guess if I have drill misregistration, as long as it doesn't come closer than 2 mils, it's OK!   I needs comments and/or suggestions.   This inquiry is on a cross section method.  I will plan to do a flat section later.

Victor,

From: Hernandez, Victor G
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 9:11 AM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum ([log in to unmask])
Cc: Hernandez, Victor G
Subject: Electrical Spacing, Clearance to PTH copper barrel, IPC-6012C

Fellow TechNetters;

   I am searching for info on electrical spacing requirements between an internal conductor/Land to PTH copper barrel distance.   In my case it can be either drill process misregistration and/or internal core misregistration.  In either case what is the closest distance that a conductor/land can be to the PTH copper barrel.

Victor,


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2