TECHNET Archives

September 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:54:08 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
I keep a few "Home Depot" lead test swabs "just in case". I did verify the efficacy, so when a lead free solder bar was swabbed, it "passed", and a 63-37" bar was swabbed, it failed. 

Quick & dirty, similar to silver chromate test, objective but not quantified.

Just a note of caution in your new endeavor:

Beware of lead free (RoHS) compliant vs. compatible. "Compliant" might not tolerate higher process temperatures even though the parts meet RoHS requirements. Headers & connectors are the worst offenders.

Ed Popielarski
Engineering Manager


                               970 NE 21st Ct.
                              Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

                              Ph: 360-675-1322
                              Fx: 206-624-0695
                              Cl: 949-581-6601

       "It's one kind of victory to slay a beast, move a mountain, and cross a chasm, but it's another kind altogether to realize that the beast, the mountain, and the chasm were of your own design."
https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Collins
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] lead free (RoHS) testing in manufacturing

Good day TechNet
We are a late arrival to the lead-free party, as our customers thus far are exempt.  But a couple of them see the writing on the wall and are moving toward RoHS compliance.  Which leads me to two questions with regards to our testing of parts to ensure compliance.

The first question - what XRF?  We are concerned with price given that we are dipping our feet here, does anyone have a recommendation for a good but inexpensive unit?

Second question is concerning alternative test methods, a customer is planning to use 3M LeadCheck swabs (LC-8S10C) to ensure no lead.  Given that the product is described as for use on painted surfaces I don't think this is intended as a way to verify lead-free status on electronics.  Any comments on this?

Thanks!

--
regards,

Graham Collins
Senior Process Engineer
Sunsel Systems
(902) 444-7867 ext 211



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2