TECHNET Archives

August 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:26:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
I don't completely understand the anti-GMO stuff.  To me, GMO food is just 
as good for humans eat as non-GMO food, in some cases better, as with 
golden rice.  I can understand the crop diversity and possible unforeseen 
environmental effects arguments, but they need to be substantiated with 
data. 

Karen Tellefsen - Electrical Testing
Alpha / 109 Corporate Blvd./ S. Plainfield, NJ 07080
[log in to unmask]
908-791-3069




From:   Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>, 
Date:   08/26/2014 11:24 AM
Subject:        Re: [TN] NTC - I believe ... (my credo)
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



Ha, ha. Recently I asked an anti-GMO signature collector if he would eat
corn. Of course he would. 
Then I pointed out that corn is GMO, starting as grass. He walked away.

Ahne. 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dwight Mattix
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 7:28 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] NTC - I believe ... (my credo)

corn is grass.


"Grass is what my food eats."   Ron Swanson


At 07:11 AM 8/26/2014, Pete wrote:
>Some good answers here, led me to do some more research
>
>About 1/3 of the US corn crop goes towards livestock feed.
>13% is exported.
>40% is used for ethanol production
>That leaves 14% for food and beverage (including oils, syrups, sugars)
>
>Ethanol is being used in some cases to replace MTBE, to increase octane 
>rating.  Why?  Because of it's resistance to ignition.  This is  very 
>tiny percentage of the gasoline blend.  E10 and E85 are ethanol as an 
>attempt to replace fossil fuels.  However, that resistance to ignition, 
>when used at 10% or 86% is what makes it an inefficient fuel, 
>increasing consumption by 3% or 25% respectively.  It takes one unit of 
>fossil fuel to generate 1.3 units of (less efficient) ethanol fuel.
>
>Since 1980, the ethanol industry has received $45B in government 
subsidies.
>
>The windmills don't seem so bad anymore.
>
>Pete


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________




***** Please note that my E-Mail address has changed *****

____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
____________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2