TECHNET Archives

August 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:07:12 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
At 08:52 AM 8/26/2014, Karen Tellefsen wrote:
>Oyster Creek, 3 km from Barnegat  Bay, survived Hurricane Sandy even
>though it was flooded,  NJ was lucky.
>
>I still think we need nukes; we just need to be careful.
>
>Karen Tellefsen -


<puts serious hat back on>


Indeed.  It's just an engineering problem. Less FUD, more 
engineering, and we're all better off.
That and allow for disposal/conversion technologies to be used in the 
US that are banned as result of (well meaning but misguided) 
non-proliferation regulations.



http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=30538


https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Israeli_company_develops_new_radioactive_waste_conversion_process




tangent:
Seems the recent US Natural gas boom shifts the breakpt for competing 
on pwr costs out quite a bit.




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2