TECHNET Archives

August 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:43:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
I thought the corn farm start booming due to high demand of ethanol  
as part of fuel.  Corn  also been used as sugar producing as well.   
however, not all corns are equal.  the US breed is more sugar than  
the others (sweet corn).  Gov got a lot to do with the wind mills and  
corns - incentive sometimes can swing things around to extreme (not  
market balance can handle with the strong force present like gov.   
same can be said to the leadfree).  my 2 cents.
          jk

On Aug 25, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Pete wrote:

> Sorry to dredge this up after it's been quiet for a few weeks, but...
>
> I've been on vacation.  Spent 2 weeks driving around the US of A.   
> This conversation struck me, because among all of the amazing  
> things things I saw, 2 were rather significant because they seemed  
> un-natural.
>
> Wind farms.  LOTS of wind farms.  Corn.  INSANE amounts of corn.   
> Both left me with the same thoughts of a wasteful use of resources.
>
> Wind farms.  What did it cost to build them?  Operate them?   Not  
> just in dollars, but in energy, too.  At least half of them,  
> probably more, weren't even spinning regardless of the wind  
> action.  If we had spent those dollars cleaning up toxic chemicals  
> or even Ebola vaccines, we could be saving many lives each day  
> instead of jousting the windmill of maybe reducing global  
> temperatures by a degree in the next 100 years.  Or maybe spend  
> those dollars on research into viable clean energy to replace  
> fossil fuels.
>
> Corn.  No way the country is eating that much corn.  Sure the  
> energy balance for corn-ethanol is getting better (thanks to GMOs -  
> uh-oh!).   But again, is this the BEST use of those resources?    
> Could we be growing better food in those fields, making fuel from  
> something that has a better energy balance, spending the money more  
> efficiently?
>
> And another point was made that has always made me wonder.  We  
> generate a LOT of heat to make energy.  Has anyone ever studied if  
> that has more effect on climate change than the emissions?
>
> Pete


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2