 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:04:00 +0000 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
base64 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
...and the evidence is where?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Ellis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 8:58 AM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Larson, Mark
Subject: Re: [TN] NTC - I believe ... (my credo)
The abiotic hypothesis (it is not a theory) has been around for many years but no one has yet been able to provide enough evidence to take it beyond speculation. On the other hand, there is plenty of scientific evidence for the biotic theory.
On 27/08/2014 16:46, Larson, Mark wrote:
> You sun revolves around the earth people need to educate yourselves
> that there is no such thing as "fossil" fuels
>
> http://www.wnd.com/2008/02/45838/
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
