DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

August 2014

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brooks, William" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Fri, 8 Aug 2014 11:14:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi Heather,

My first reaction to your question is a question... what size and type of via do you want to use... is it a thru hole via, blind via? Laser drilled via? Capped and plugged via? Back drilled via? There are so many flavors... :)

Usually you will find that there is a way to do what you want... but it may cost more and have undesirable impacts on the design and/or its manufacture... 
A good designer will look at all the options and find the most cost effective, functional and simplest solution to solve the deign challenge. 

A thru hole via typically if placed into a pad of a 0805 resistor without any special consideration will most likely wick the molten solder away from that pad it is embedded in when reflowing the board causing the part to be 'solder starved'... under those conditions, while in the reflow oven, I would not be surprised if the part didn’t 'tombstone' (or stand up erect) due to the surface tension of the solder on the opposite pad... The larger the diameter of the hole in the via, the more the capillary action and movement of solder down the hole... the smaller, the less... 

I have put small .008 in. vias in TO-220 package or thermal pads under IC's like SO-8 or SO-14 packages and had them solder successfully. A larger diameter via would steal the solder from the part as it wicked down the plated thru hole... Other types of vias like blind or buried vias can be more expensive than standard thru hole vias... but they have their proper applications... 
 
An 0805 package is a large part compared to some of the parts we use these days...maybe a smaller part would allow you to get a thru hole via in without putting it into the pad?
Just a thought... :) Maybe an 0603 or 0402 package? Would the design tolerate that?


William Brooks, CID+
Senior MTS (Contract) 
2747 Loker Ave West
Carlsbad, CA 92010-6603
760-930-7212
Fax:        760.918.8332
Mobile:    760.216.0170
E-mail:    [log in to unmask]



-----Original Message-----
From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Heather Gregg
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 4:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [DC] Vias in pads

Hello,
It has been a number of years since I was active in the PCB design realm. I was asked a question yesterday about the possibility of placing vias inside a component pad. My first response was "no way", but then I thought maybe things have changed.

I have used vias in heatsink pads for thermal reasons, but this designer was asking about placing a signal via inside one pad of an 0805 resistor.
What are the guidelines these days?

Thanks,
Heather Gregg


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0.
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL) For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com

This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of the email or its contents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately, by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

WARNING: Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission.
_____________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0.

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.

To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)

For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2