TECHNET Archives

July 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:01:16 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (155 lines)
It is a good idea to double check the torque after soldering as part of the final inspection. 
I would suggest after the final inspection, that the nut be captured with Glyptal. The nylon washer will continue to cold flow over time, as my good friend Mr. Bogden explained, and the torque could continue to relax somewhat. The Glyptal will at least prevent the nut from loosening.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of stephen gregory
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 5:24 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Screws losing torque by themselves

Hi Wayne,

Thanks, and thanks to everyone that responded. I guess I didn't think about things clearly when I posted my question. The reason was that that we've been building these assemblies for a while and just lately the problem has become an issue with our customer, which leads me to believe that for some reason they've been recently checking torque values on this hardware after we've shipped the assemblies to them.

I can surmise a lot of things about why they might have been checking them, but I don't know for sure. But I do know one thing now, those screws and nuts will lose torque during our normal build processes.

Steve  


________________________________
 From: Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2014 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [TN] Screws losing torque by themselves
 

Hi Steve-

I love the video. I've been trying to tell the mechanical engineers I've worked with about the problems with the helical washers (sometimes stupidly referred to as "lock" washers!). This video assists with developing an intuitive feel for what's going on. The helical washers do have their place, but not in a high vibration environment, and virtually always in addition to a thread locking system of some type (double nut or chemical adhesive).

The root of your problem is in the understanding of what Glass Transition Temperature means. It means that above that temperature, the material will deform PERMANENTLY if placed under a load. Nylon has an extremely low Tg, but even most PC board materials top out at about 170C.

So you're asking us why, when you put a clamp on some plastic material and take it way above its Tg, it seems to deform, thus reducing the clamp pressure?

Wayne
________________________________________
From: TechNet [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Yuan-chia Joyce Koo [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 5:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Screws losing torque by themselves

Nylon washer might made of nylon 66, that would be lost of mechanical
strength during your wave temperature.  see attached.  IMO.  (double
check your datasheet for the washer for thermal properties.  fyi.
http://www.plastic-products.com/spec1.htm
    joyce
On Jul 3, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Steve Gregory wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thought I might try to catch you before you left for your 4th of
> July holiday. We have a strange little issue that we're trying to
> figure out that's been happening with some torqued hardware on a
> board that we build.
>
>
>
> The assembly has this heat-sink/bracket deal with four TO-220
> devices put together before we stuff the board and wave solder it.
> The bracket is aluminum and we first put down a SIL pad, then the
> TO-220 devices, three of them get nylon shoulder washers, then a
> split lock washer, then a nut. The three devices with the nylon
> shoulder washers get torqued to 3.4 in/lb., and the one without the
> shoulder washer gets torqued to 6 in/lb. We tighten and torque from
> the screw side, and hold the 3/16ths nut stationary.
>
>
>
> Then the whole bracket assembly is stuffed into the board along
> with the rest of the parts, then the board is wave-soldered and
> cleaned. Any touch-up is done, then there are certain parts and
> points on the board that is RTV'ed and cured, then the board is
> shipped.
>
>
>
> Our customer has been finding that when they get the boards and
> they check that the hardware is torqued, they can get ¼ to
> sometimes a ½ a turn on the screws with the shoulder washers before
> the torque driver clicks, and of course we're getting zinged for
> not torqueing the hardware. The ones without the shoulder washers
> are not near as bad, but they tell us that they have been finding a
> few that they can turn a little before the torque driver clicks.
> We've got new torque drivers and they're set correctly. We even
> sent our drivers to our customer so they could check them out and
> compare them with the drivers that they have. They were pretty much
> identical. We use Lindstrom torque drivers, so they're not some
> cheap knock-off brand.
>
>
>
> Here's a picture of the bracket and screws we're having most of the
> trouble with:
>
>
>
> http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Bracket-Heatsink.jpg
>
>
>
> I've checked them here, and I find the same thing. I know they were
> torqued properly when the brackets were assembled, but when I check
> the boards that have been wave soldered and cleaned, I find I can
> get ¼ turn one the screws with the nylon shoulder washers before
> the torque driver clicks.
>
>
>
> I've always thought that when you used a screw and nut with a split-
> washer it would hold it's torque, but then I found this:
>
>
>
> http://www.boltscience.com/pages/helicalspringwashers.htm
>
>
>
> So now I'm not sure. Has anybody ever run into this issue? Is it
> normal to have things "relax" like this after they've been torqued?
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2