TECHNET Archives

June 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Gumpert, Ben" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Gumpert, Ben
Date:
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:28:02 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Syed,

Your question makes me think of Direct Immersion Gold (used as a PWB finish), which I don't have any experience with, but which several people on TechNet seem to have had success with.

That's in the 2-4 microinches range, but part of its ability to protect the copper comes from the density of the deposit - I'm not sure how sputtering compares in that aspect. And storage on a shelf prior to soldering may differ a bit from 'storage' in soil.

Ben 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ahmad, Syed
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [TN] Sputtered gold thickness for copper corrosion protection in soil

Any suggestion on how thick a sputtered layer of gold on copper terminal is necessary for corrosion protection? The gold sputtered copper terminals are to be in contact with soil and probed periodically.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2