TECHNET Archives

May 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 May 2014 20:20:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
Ed,
1. No
2) I haven't decided which set of pass/fail limits to land on yet.
Bev

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ed Popielarski
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 12:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] PCB Cleanliness Via Ion Chromatography Poll (informal)

1: No

2: IPC

Ed Popielarski
Engineering Manager


                               970 NE 21st Ct.
                              Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

                              Ph: 360-675-1322
                              Fx: 206-624-0695
                              Cl: 949-581-6601

       "It's one kind of victory to slay a beast, move a mountain, and cross
a chasm, but it's another kind altogether to realize that the beast, the
mountain, and the chasm were of your own design."
https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.0
11188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard Kraszewski
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 6:28 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] PCB Cleanliness Via Ion Chromatography Poll (informal)

I actually sent this out on May  16th, but never got a single response.
Hoping that was not due to lack of interest, but rather due to the TechNet
being down. Hence, I think I'll try this one more time.

I am  hoping to run an informal " min straw poll " here.

Questions stated  are as follows:


1.       "Is your organization testing  incoming  PCB cleanliness  via ion-
chromatography?             Replies such as "YES" or "NO" will suffice, but
more detailed explanations are also acceptable.



2.       " If testing via IC, do you use IPC -5704 Table 4.1 limits or
other?                                                Replies such as " IPC"
or "other"  will suffice, but more detailed explanations are also
acceptable.

What's in  it for  you?   I will summarize and post the results after a few
days of replies.

Rich  Kraszewski
Senior Process Engineer
Plexus


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2