TECHNET Archives

May 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, SALA GABRIELE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 May 2014 22:46:57 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
Hi Dale,

take a look to the Directive 2011/65/EU RoHS II.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:174:0088:011
0:EN:PDF

there are plenty of significant differences, CE mark now will warranty the
full RoHS II compliance. That's not a so easy effort to fulfil all the
necessary Technical Documentation.

Take a look to Annex III, plenty of those Exempted Applications are already
expired, and if you check on your shelves, you'll find plenty of your
components declared RoHS (2002/95/EC) compliant that now are not more
compliant with 2011/65/EU.

Component supplier declarations (COC) ? Suppliers they try to do their best,
but  main goal for them is to sale components to customers, fortunately for
them, not so much aware about the meaning of 2011/65/EU ......

Gabriele


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Per conto di Dale Ritzen
Inviato: venerdì 16 maggio 2014 19.55
A: [log in to unmask]
Oggetto: [TN] RoHS 2 Requirements

Okay Technetters, need your help! This may be old news to most of you but
I'm starting to get inquiries from clients that ask whether the components
we use to build their products are RoHS 2 compliant. As far as I can tell
from the research I've done, not much changed with the re-cast of the RoHS
directive. I don't believe any new elements were added to the list of
forbidden chemicals and mostly administrative changes were made to the
directive. Maybe I missed something...

We also haven't seen a major rush from our component suppliers to document
RoHS 2 compliance on their invoices/pack lists. In fact, I can't think of
any that have used that updated text. All of them still use the "RoHS
Compliant" statement, which I believe covers basically the same ground as
stating compliance to RoHS 2. 

Anyone care to weigh in on the differences between the old/new directives
and/or the necessity to document compliance to RoHS 2?

Thanks!
Dale Ritzen, ASQ CQA
Quality Manager / ISO Management Representative
Austin Manufacturing Services

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________


---
Questa e-mail è priva di virus e malware perché è attiva la protezione avast! Antivirus.
http://www.avast.com

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2