TECHNET Archives

May 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Pete <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 May 2014 21:08:03 -0400
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Peter,
REACH is based on the weight of the article, not the "homogeneous material
that is mechanically separable as it is for RoHS.

So, if you are talking about a PCB that is not populated, there is NO WAY
that there could be enough cobalt to fail REACH.

In an assembly I again can't believe there would be enough cobalt in the
ICs, hard gold, Superinvar and/or recording media to trigger the REACH
limit. Any chance they were stupid enough to grind up a Li ion (LiCo2)
battery is there?

Bev

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Too much Cobalt in my PCB?

We just got a lab report back saying we fail REACH because of an excess of
cobalt.  The lab is trying to tell us it's the cobalt in the copper on the
PCB and ICs.

I tend to believe something else was ground up with the board, accidentally
or purposefully.  They did include the piezo sounder hanging off the board.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2