TECHNET Archives

April 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:27:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Ioan,

I've not dealt with these particular folks.

The short version response is that you will get what you pay for!

There can be SO many possible defect modes, especially if you have a mix of
fine/heavy wire wedge + ball bonding.  Exponentially add to that mix if you
have RF/high frequency demands such as tight loop control, tight wire length
control, tight bond size control, etc. in the mix.

Definitely, make up many 'salted' units for the systems to inspect.
Minimum/nominal/maximum conditions for each defect mode that you intend to
consider.  This gets VERY burdensome, but you need some metric [golden
units] to judge the various machines by.

You may even end up going into each wire, or wire group, depending on
bonder, and altering the looping profile to so you can determine if the AOI
equipment can detect if the wire near the second bond is lying too close to
an adjacent conductor, etc.

Tails on wedge bonds, and wire sweep/proximity to adjacent wires is usually
the easy stuff

I don't have any current pricing usage info that would be meaningful, but
will acknowledge that processing speeds and vision software has greatly
improved so even if the machine will not do a COMPLETE inspection, possibly
it can inspect for the most critical items, thereby taking some of the load
of human inspectors which tend miss things....

FWIW


Steve Creswick
Sr Associate - Balanced Enterprise Solutions
http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevencreswick
                         616 834 1883




-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ioan TEMPEA
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Wire-bonding AOI

Dear Technos,

I need info regarding AOI machines with wire bonding inspection capability.
Efficiency of the technology, suppliers, price tags, table top vs. inline,
personal experiences, can they also do regular SMT AOI, anything you can
tell me, on-line or off-line.

Any particular experience with this one?
http://www.viscom.com/asia/products/wire-bond-inspection-aoi/s6053bo-vs6056b
o-inline-aoi/

Thanks,

Ioan Tempea, P. Eng.
Manufacturing Engineer
Satellite Systems
MDA
21025 TransCanada Highway
Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Qc, Canada H9X 3R2
Tel: +1-514-457-2150-3556
www.mdacorporation.com<http://www.mdacorporation.com>

This e-mail, and any attachments, are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, proprietary and/or
confidential information. Any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution
or copying of this e-mail and any attachments for any purposes that have not
been specifically authorized by the sender is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by
reply e-mail and permanently delete all copies and attachments.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2