Hi Wayne,

You are right in a sense, BUT board shops normally don't like ‎admitting they have a problem, so it's much more effective to show them data. I don't remember a single case when a board shop gets back a bad board and says yes, we screwed it.
 Normally it's NFF.

Regards,

Vladimir


Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
  Original Message  
From: Wayne Thayer
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 6:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
Subject: Re: [TN] BGA non wetting pads

Sorry, but I disagree. If Phil isn't the board fabricator, then all he needs to show is the pads are contaminated, which a wetting test shows very quickly and cheaply. It's the board fab that needs the SEM/EDS or whatever so they can figure out where they messed up. Actually, even more importantly they need to learn how to do "fitness for use" wettability testing so they don't send out crap!

Wayne

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Vladimir Igoshev
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 6:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] BGA non wetting pads

Hi Phil,

You need to do proper analysis (SEM/EDS). Let me know‎ if you want us to help.

Regards,

Vladimir

SENTEC

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
  Original Message
From: Phil Bavaro
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 5:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
Subject: [TN] BGA non wetting pads

Ok, I have a head scratcher.

We have a recently built boards which exhibited 3/4 failing at functional test. The board finish is ENIG, solder mask is SMOBC, material is Hitachi (formerly Rogers "Theta"), and we are using a ROHS BGAs reballed with Sn63Pb37 spheres and water soluble paste. Oven profile was 220 C max, preheat ramp, etc.

We focused on one BGA which had JTAG capability built into the circuit. Comnponent would not respond to JTAG.

The xray inspection did not reveal any distinct anomalies. Most of my group felt the balls had collapsed adequately but I remain the pessimist in this situation. We did not have a board available to have the BGA cross sectioned so I was concerned as I thought I say excessive gap between the part and the PWB.

We tried reheating one board using the Rework system and bumped up the reflow max to 230C. No help, but the voids in the xrays did grow (as you would expect).

Here is where it gets strange....

We remove the part, and seven random BGA's pads are still completely gold in color. Absolutely no solder wetting to these pads. A few appear to have transparent contamination on the pads. I don't see what I have known to be black pad (years ago) and some of these gold pads are bright gold.

I can only think of one scenario and that would be complete misprint on seven pads but really doubt that as the cause.

I try to repeat this defect on a solder sample PWB with just paste printed and every pad takes solder.

I am trying to send Steve my photos.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

Phil
________________________________
This message and any attachments are solely for the use of the addressee and may contain L-3 proprietary information that may also be defined as USG export controlled technical data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, use or distribution of its content is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete this message and any attachments.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________