Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:31:27 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Victor-
As long as solder doesn't wet to the conductor, it is considered masked. I can't count the number of times "solder mask" has been confused with "insulator"! Did it myself a couple of times until I got caught and then realized it was only a mask. If you need guaranteed thickness without pinholes on an outer layer, use polyimide "coverlay".
On the other side of thickness control, I've seen lumps which prevented stencil gasketing.
I believe IPC advises on chemistry/compatibility issues of mask, as well as incomplete masks which don't do an effective job of masking solder, but not thickness.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Victor Hernandez
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 8:07 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Solder mask thickness
Fellow TechNetters:
What are some bench mark thicknesses for solder mask coverage over external conductors/signals. I have not seen an actual value in any of the IPC STD that I have read, IPC-2222, IPC-6012, IPC-SM-840. I believe that that are three different manufacturers.
Victor,
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|