TECHNET Archives

February 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:13:03 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
 One IC manufacturer used a no clean flux on the components in its vented
BGA package.
This was fine for the majority of its customers using a no clean process.

Cleaning the package was interesting as the Govt requirement was di water,
the customer used a chemistry and would not provide a wavier.
It was an airborne device.

It was only after there were test failures were the various conflicting
reports pulled out and received from the customer, supplier and agency.
An incoming spec would have helped.

Larry Dzaugis


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2