Thanks guys, I always look forward to the challenge, win or loose 
(foul), it's still fun and somewhat educational, although sometimes I 
wonder where Dave digs up his answers from.    I think he uses a box of 
tricks and a Ouija board/ball.
Thought I nailed it.

pat


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, David D. Hillman wrote:

> Hi Richard - FEQAB did not say that anyone had to be fully awake and 
> conscious, they just assumed at the time the FEQ is sent out, folks 
> could be fully awake and conscious. If the members of TechNet want to 
> respond to the FEQ in a state of unconsciousness, they are welcome to 
> do so - which does explain some of Doug's half fractional elements.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> From:   "Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
> To:     <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:   02/18/2014 02:19 PM
> Subject:        Re: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer
> Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> FOUL! Objection! No-where in the rules does it state that submitters 
> need to be fully awake and conscious. It is obvious that many of the 
> answers submitted have been done while neither of those.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David D. Hillman
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11:28 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer
>
> Hi Pat! FEQAB has disallowed your foul call as the FEQ announcement 
> times have been randomly shifted to allow more equalized initial 
> TechNet notification of the question. If fact, this week's FEQ will be 
> done such that your time zone will be fully awake and conscious. Good 
> Luck.
>
>
> Dave
>
>
> From:   Patrick Goodyear <[log in to unmask]>
> To:     <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:   02/18/2014 10:53 AM
> Subject:        Re: [TN] NTC Friday Element Quiz Answer
> Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Foul, I call foul did he post less than 15 minutes after David asked 
> the question?
>
> pat
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:21 AM, David D. Hillman wrote:
>
>> Hi folks - Here is the Friday Element Quiz Answer (sorry for the slow
>> response):
>>
>> The Question:
>> This element does not exist in nature and has never been directly 
>> artificially produced. It serves only one commercial purpose: it can 
>> be used as a source to produce Cf. What element is being described?
>>
>> The Answer:
>> The element is Berkelium (Bk)! Only milligram amounts of Bk have ever 
>> been produced. Bk is produced by bombarding Am-241 with helium 
>> creating Bk-243 plus two neutrons. Some Bk compounds have been 
>> produced with great difficulty - BkCl3 which weighed only 0.0000003 
>> grams (that's 3 billionths of a gram if you don't want to count the 
>> zeros).
>>
>>
>> The winner of the weekly element quiz was Mark Kostinovsky, 
>> Schlumberger, and he will get the services of Clumpy and Kloumpios 
>> for the week. The boys assisted with moving Monday's snow fall and 
>> are headed to Mark's facility today.
>>
>>
>> So far Clumpy and Kloumpios have done the following:
>>
>> Past Quiz winners/tasks:
>> Week 1 Dick Krug,  Spartan Complex Systems Week 2 Laura Turbini, IRC 
>> Week 3 James Head, Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited Week 3 Pat 
>> Goodyear, PGE Week 4 Joe Russeau, Precision Analysts Laboratory Week 
>> 5 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security Week 6 Steve 
>> Gregory Week 7 Phil Kinner Week 8 Brian Ellis Week 9 James Head, 
>> Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited Week 10 Leland Woodall, CSTech 
>> Inc.
>> Week 11 Keith Calhoun, Sopark Corp
>> Week 12 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld-Elektronik Week 13 Leland 
>> Woodall, CSTech Inc.
>> Week 14 Brian Ellis
>> Week 15 Tom Carroll, Boeing Defense, Space and Security Week 16 Steve 
>> Gregory Week 17 Phil Kinner Week 18 Ian Braddock, MBDA Systems Week 
>> 19 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
>> Week 20 Denny Fritz
>> Week 21 Amol Kane
>> Week 21 Dewey Whittaker, Honeywell
>> Week 21 David Bealer, Watch Fire Signs Week 22 Phil Kinner Week 23 
>> Guy Ramsey, RD Circuits Week 24 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger Week 
>> 25 Keith Calhoun, Sopark Corp Week 26 Paul Reid, PWB Interconnect 
>> Solutions Inc Week 27 Greg Munie, IPC Week 28 Steve Gregory Week 29 
>> Gus Trakas, Viasystems Week 29 Steve Creswick Week 30 Robert Welch, 
>> Moog Component Group Week 31 Heidi Havelka, Interplex Sunbelt Week 32 
>> Raye Rivera, Canoga Perkins Week 33 Steve Creswick Week 34 Dewey 
>> Whittaker, Honeywell Week 35 Don Vischulis Week 36 Greg Munie, IPC 
>> Week 37 Larry Dzaugis Week 37 Bonus Question Steve Mikell Week 38 
>> Curt McNamara, Logic PD Week 38 Bonus Question Dewey Whittaker, 
>> Honeywell Week 39 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
>> Week 40 Leland Woodall, CSTech Inc.
>> Week 40 Ron Feyereisen, Sigmatron Int.
>>
>> Week 41 Steve Gregory
>> - baked a birthday cake with the boys severely stressing a dozen eggs 
>> in the process!
>>
>> Week 42 Steve Mikell
>> - assisted with ????
>>
>> Week 43 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger
>> - assisted with ????
>>
>>
>> Everyone have a safe week.
>>
>> Dave Hillman
>> Rockwell Collins
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud 
>> service.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
>> [log in to unmask] 
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud 
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud 
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud 
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud 
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________