TECHNET Archives

January 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:30:13 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
Phil,

I'm referring to a heat sink for several TO-220 packages that has one mounting tab at each end inserted into thru-holes with no crimp. Supposing the hole fill on the mounting tabs is well below IPC spec  I believe that is OK since the solder is a  mechanical mount only. I recall that soldering the source side only (with a complete fillet) creates a mechanical pull out strength relatively equal to when the barrel is full, since the hole wall contributes very little at that point.

Ed Popielarski
Engineering Manager


                               970 NE 21st Ct.
                              Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

                              Ph: 360-675-1322
                              Fx: 206-624-0695
                              Cl: 949-581-6601

https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A


-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 4:08 PM
To: Ed Popielarski
Subject: RE: Mechanical fastening strength vs. hole fill

Are you referring to a mechanical post with crimp as opposed to soldered in post?  A post in a PTH without anything to bond it doesn't make sense.

I always have advised not to rely on solder for mechanical strength unless you have a lot of soldering locations and lots of surface area (RF/EMI shield with many soldered feet, for example).

On the other hand, if someone were to say that a post soldered in a PTH was not reliable, there are an awful lot of PGAs out there that say the opposite.

Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ed Popielarski
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Mechanical fastening strength vs. hole fill

Greetings, all.

I recall reading an article many years ago regarding "mechanical only" (such as a heatsink) through hole connections being more reliable and just as strong (pull out strength) if the barrel is not filled.

Might anyone have some insight?

Ed Popielarski
Engineering Manager

[Description: FullLogo]
                               970 NE 21st Ct.
                              Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

                              Ph: 360-675-1322
                              Fx: 206-624-0695
                              Cl: 949-581-6601

https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________
________________________________
 This message and any attachments are solely for the use of the addressee and may contain L-3 proprietary information that may also be defined as USG export controlled technical data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, use or distribution of its content is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete this message and any attachments.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2