TECHNET Archives

January 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"lduso - Diamond-MT.com" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, lduso - Diamond-MT.com
Date:
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:00:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (122 lines)
You forgot one, "looks poopy"

Lloyd Duso
Diamond-MT
Plant Manager
(814) 535-3505
www.Diamond-mt.com


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Stadem, Richard D. <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> So many come to mind, Doug!
>
> Aberration
> Inconsistency
> Deviation
> Irregularity
> Eccentricity
> Unconformity
> Hillmanite
> Non-conformity
> Incongruity
> Peculiarity
> Exception
> Departure from normal, or abnormality
> Conversation piece
> Freak
> Objet d'art
> Monstrosity
> Weird image
> Strangeness
> Non-typical specimen
> Rarity
> Oddity
> Paulism
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 7:35 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term
>
> Ohhhhhh, I can only imagine the fun of writing a section of IPC-A-610
> referring to Obnubilations. Perhaps, since this relates to cloudiness, I
> could use it when describing coating blush.
>
> Doug Pauls
>
>
>
> From:   Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
> To:     IPC TechNet Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Doug Pauls
> <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:   01/06/2014 04:49 PM
> Subject:        Re: [TN] Help with  a Term
>
>
>
> Hi Doug
>
> An Obnubilation!
>
> Alternatively, an ?Inscrutible Obscurity?
>
> Boringly, an Obscurity...
>
> ?but if all else fails, a ?Wachamacallit?.
>
> Graham N
>
>
> On 6 Jan 2014, at 22:10, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Good afternoon all,
> >
> > I need help finding an adequate term for something, so I thought I
> > would
>
> > ask you all.
> >
> > If I am inspecting conformal coating, and I see a visual "item of
> > interest", what term generically do I call the "item of interest"?
> > The item of interest may or may not be a defect but it looks visually
> > different than the coating around it.
> >
> > I have tried Visual Anomaly, or Visual Artifact, but people here don't
> > seem to like any of them?
> >
> > What do y'all think?
> >
> > Doug Pauls
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> > For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> > ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2