I would think anomaly would be most appropriate. Imperfection or irregularity would also seem applicable.
Perhaps a process indicator?
Regards,
Tony Musall
Project Engineer
Foresite, Inc.
1982 S. Elizabeth St.
Kokomo, IN 46902
Phone: (765) 457-8095
Fax: (765) 457-9033
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris BALL
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 1:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term
POK mark
(possibly OK)
-Chris
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Patrick Goodyear <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> potential defect?
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Jim Carlson wrote:
>
> Oddity
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Douglas Pauls [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 02:29 PM Pacific Standard Time
>> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term
>>
>> Sort of, but implies that it is undesirable or a defect. What I am
>> looking for is a term that says it looks different, but not
>> necessarily bad or actionable.
>>
>> Doug Pauls
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "
>> [log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: 01/06/2014 04:18 PM
>> Subject: RE: [TN] Help with a Term
>>
>>
>>
>> Blemish?
>>
>> Ed Popielarski
>> Engineering Manager
>>
>>
>> 970 NE 21st Ct.
>> Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277
>>
>> Ph: 360-675-1322
>> Fx: 206-624-0695
>> Cl: 949-581-6601
>>
>>
>> https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-
>> 122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
>> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 2:10 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [TN] Help with a Term
>>
>> Good afternoon all,
>>
>> I need help finding an adequate term for something, so I thought I
>> would ask you all.
>>
>> If I am inspecting conformal coating, and I see a visual "item of
>> interest", what term generically do I call the "item of interest"?
>> The item of interest may or may not be a defect but it looks visually
>> different than the coating around it.
>>
>> I have tried Visual Anomaly, or Visual Artifact, but people here
>> don't seem to like any of them?
>>
>> What do y'all think?
>>
>> Doug Pauls
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> _ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>> service.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> _ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>> service.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ________________________________________
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY, EXPORT CONTROL AND DISCLAIMER NOTE: This e-mail and
>> any attachments are solely for the use of the addressee and may
>> contain information that is privileged or confidential. Any
>> disclosure, use or distribution of the information contained herein
>> is prohibited. In the event this e-mail contains technical data
>> within the definition of the International Traffic in Arms
>> Regulations or Export Administration Regulations, it is subject to the export control laws of the U.S.
>> Government. The recipient should check this e-mail and any
>> attachments for the presence of viruses as L-3 does not accept any
>> liability associated with the transmission of this e-mail. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
>> by reply e-mail and immediately delete this message and any attachments.
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> _ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>> service.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ________________________________________
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ________________________________________
>
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s).
The information contained therein may be confidential or privileged, and its disclosure or reproduction is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please return it immediately to its sender at the above address and destroy it.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
