TECHNET Archives

January 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:18:24 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Indication

Don Vischulis

Sent from my iPad

> On Jan 6, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Good afternoon all,
> 
> I need help finding an adequate term for something, so I thought I would 
> ask you all.
> 
> If I am inspecting conformal coating, and I see a visual "item of 
> interest", what term generically do I call the "item of interest"?  The 
> item of interest may or may not be a defect but it looks visually 
> different than the coating around it.
> 
> I have tried Visual Anomaly, or Visual Artifact, but people here don't 
> seem to like any of them?
> 
> What do y'all think?
> 
> Doug Pauls
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2