Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:35:58 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Doug,
"risk area"?
Mayor problem is to define if it is a risk or just an optical failure...
Best Regards
Torsten
KRISTRONICS GmbH
Torsten Hagge
team leader HW development &
tech. projectmanager
Gewerbegrund 5-9
24955 Harrislee
Telefon +49 (0) 461 7741-624
Telefax +49 (0) 461 7741-642
[log in to unmask]
www.kristronics.de
Place of jurisdiction: Flensburg, commercial register: HRB 1433 FL
CEO Dipl.-Ing. oec. Thormod Ohm
VAD-Id DE 811182059
Bank account: Deutsche Bank AG Flensburg, account 4216610, bank number 21570011
IBAN: DE32 2157 0011 0421 6610 00, BIC: DEUT DE HH 215
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Douglas Pauls
Gesendet: Montag, 6. Januar 2014 23:10
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: [TN] Help with a Term
Good afternoon all,
I need help finding an adequate term for something, so I thought I would ask you all.
If I am inspecting conformal coating, and I see a visual "item of interest", what term generically do I call the "item of interest"? The item of interest may or may not be a defect but it looks visually different than the coating around it.
I have tried Visual Anomaly, or Visual Artifact, but people here don't seem to like any of them?
What do y'all think?
Doug Pauls
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|