potential defect?
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Jim Carlson wrote:
> Oddity
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Douglas Pauls [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 02:29 PM Pacific Standard Time
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term
>
> Sort of, but implies that it is undesirable or a defect. What I am
> looking for is a term that says it looks different, but not
> necessarily bad or actionable.
>
> Doug Pauls
>
>
>
> From: Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>,
> "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 01/06/2014 04:18 PM
> Subject: RE: [TN] Help with a Term
>
>
>
> Blemish?
>
> Ed Popielarski
> Engineering Manager
>
>
> 970 NE 21st Ct.
> Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277
>
> Ph: 360-675-1322
> Fx: 206-624-0695
> Cl: 949-581-6601
>
>
> https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 2:10 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Help with a Term
>
> Good afternoon all,
>
> I need help finding an adequate term for something, so I thought I
> would ask you all.
>
> If I am inspecting conformal coating, and I see a visual "item of
> interest", what term generically do I call the "item of interest"?
> The item of interest may or may not be a defect but it looks visually
> different than the coating around it.
>
> I have tried Visual Anomaly, or Visual Artifact, but people here don't
> seem to like any of them?
>
> What do y'all think?
>
> Doug Pauls
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY, EXPORT CONTROL AND DISCLAIMER NOTE: This e-mail and
> any attachments are solely for the use of the addressee and may
> contain information that is privileged or confidential. Any
> disclosure, use or distribution of the information contained herein is
> prohibited. In the event this e-mail contains technical data within
> the definition of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations or
> Export Administration Regulations, it is subject to the export control
> laws of the U.S. Government. The recipient should check this e-mail
> and any attachments for the presence of viruses as L-3 does not accept
> any liability associated with the transmission of this e-mail. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by
> reply e-mail and immediately delete this message and any attachments.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
