TECHNET Archives

January 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:49:01 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Hi Doug

An Obnubilation!

Alternatively, an “Inscrutible Obscurity”

Boringly, an Obscurity...

…but if all else fails, a “Wachamacallit”.

Graham N


On 6 Jan 2014, at 22:10, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Good afternoon all,
> 
> I need help finding an adequate term for something, so I thought I would 
> ask you all.
> 
> If I am inspecting conformal coating, and I see a visual "item of 
> interest", what term generically do I call the "item of interest"?  The 
> item of interest may or may not be a defect but it looks visually 
> different than the coating around it.
> 
> I have tried Visual Anomaly, or Visual Artifact, but people here don't 
> seem to like any of them?
> 
> What do y'all think?
> 
> Doug Pauls
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2