TECHNET Archives

January 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:12:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
Hi Doug,
 
This issue is older than the hills and almost as old as me.
 
I've always wondered what the list of parameters and values that would define a tape for this purpose would look like.
 
Any ideas out there?
 
Best regards,
Gerry
 
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:40:25 -0600
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Tape for adhesion testing
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> Good afternoon all,
> 
> As far as the 3M 600 series tape is concerned, be aware that there are 
> two, count them two, 3M 600 tapes.  The one that comes from 3Ms Stationary 
> Division, usually used for wrapping Christmas presents, has a relatively 
> low adhesive strength.  The 3M 600 tape that comes from their Industrial 
> supplies division is much stronger.  So if you want the coating test to 
> pass you use the Stationary tape.  If you want the coating to fail, you 
> use the Industrial tape. 
> 
> Doug Pauls
> 
> 
> 
> From:   "Robert e. welch" <[log in to unmask]>
> To:     <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:   01/30/2014 12:43 PM
> Subject:        Re: [TN] Tape for adhesion testing
> Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
> 
> 
> 
> 3M # 600 is the Only tape I've heard of for over 30 years now.
> 
> Robert E. Welch
> Senior Process Engineer
> Moog Components Group
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lamar Young
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:22 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Tape for adhesion testing
> 
> ASTM D-3359 is the cross cut adhesion test method that is fairly common in 
> the coating industry.
> IPC TM-650 2.4.1.6 is a similar cross cut adhesion test method. 
> 
> The ASTM called out the use of P-99 tape that was discontinued 
> approximately 5 years ago.  The ASTM committee last reported in 2010 that 
> they were still evaluating replacement tapes.
> The IPC TM-650, created in 1995, calls out 3M #600 as a suitable tape.
> 
> I was curious if most are using the #600 or a different tape (please 
> specify).
> The tape choice question surfaced during a discussion with a customer that 
> originally specified a different tape. 
> I thought I'd ask others in the industry to better understand what tape 
> the majority of the industry was using.
> 
> Thanks for your replies,
> Lamar Young
> Specialty Coating Systems, Inc.
> 7645 Woodland Dr.
> Indianapolis, IN 46278
> (317) 244-1200 Ext. 276
> www.scscoatings.com
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
 		 	   		  

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2