Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:35:27 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-cc: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ohhhhhh, I can only imagine the fun of writing a section of IPC-A-610
referring to Obnubilations. Perhaps, since this relates to cloudiness, I
could use it when describing coating blush.
Doug Pauls
From: Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
To: IPC TechNet Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Doug Pauls
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: 01/06/2014 04:49 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term
Hi Doug
An Obnubilation!
Alternatively, an ?Inscrutible Obscurity?
Boringly, an Obscurity...
?but if all else fails, a ?Wachamacallit?.
Graham N
On 6 Jan 2014, at 22:10, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Good afternoon all,
>
> I need help finding an adequate term for something, so I thought I would
> ask you all.
>
> If I am inspecting conformal coating, and I see a visual "item of
> interest", what term generically do I call the "item of interest"? The
> item of interest may or may not be a defect but it looks visually
> different than the coating around it.
>
> I have tried Visual Anomaly, or Visual Artifact, but people here don't
> seem to like any of them?
>
> What do y'all think?
>
> Doug Pauls
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|