TECHNET Archives

January 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Jan 2014 08:11:11 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<01c301cf0d3c$44e411b0$ceac3510$@com>
Subject:
From:
Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
DOINK distraction observed inspection (status) not known.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Mikell
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term

I think Chris is close with this one.
But I want to avoid anything that might create a reject bias.
Sooo...
How about POC mark, PoC = Point of Contention or PoD = Point of Debate or FoD = Focus of Debate

Steve Mikell
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris BALL
Sent: 01/07/14 01:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term

POK mark (possibly OK) -Chris


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2