TECHNET Archives

December 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Rivera, Raye" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Rivera, Raye
Date:
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:13:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hello technet gurus,

I have a question regarding total copper thickness for external conductors.

3.6.2.13 states only a requirement for total conductor thickness, that is foil + plating, and references table 3-12 for the appropriate values. There is no requirement for the foil thickness.
Table 3-12 also has a column with heading:

Absolute Cu Min. (IPC-4562 less 10% reduction)

Does that column heading constitute a requirement?   Would using a copper foil less than the stated minimum constitute a rejectable condition even if total copper thickness meets requirements?

Engineering  states that they only care about the total thickness from a functional point of view.

I ask this because I have a difference of opinion with a colleague on the interpretation of the standard.

Best regards,
Raye Rivera

QA Manager * Canoga Perkins
20600 Prairie Street * Chatsworth * CA 91311-6008
818-678-3872  * [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2