TECHNET Archives

December 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Vladimir Igoshev. PhD" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Vladimir Igoshev. PhD
Date:
Tue, 24 Dec 2013 12:34:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hello Richard,

I might be wrong but I don't think one can call a "slit" or a gap
between a surface and solder a void. the situation you refer to is
rather a solderability issue with a QFN pad, but not voiding one.

And if that is the case then, yes, you are absolutely right it's not
detectable by X-ray. however, if it's a solderability issue then  it
should spread over the affected batch, not just one QFN and it's
always the best practice to qualify (by X-sectioning) any new batch of
any or at least the most vulnerable components.

-- 
Best regards,

Vladimir Igoshev. PhD                          mailto:[log in to unmask]

SENTEC Testing Laboratory Inc.
11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.
Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1
Tel: (416) 899-1882
Fax: (905) 882-8812
www.sentec.ca

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2