Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:27:00 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I must vigorously protest the horrid lack of reasoning at the
disqualification.
(1) a number of animals such as small dogs, hamsters and pigeons go "poof"
on a tin roof at 150C so that observation was not considered a defining
characteristic unique to catnium;
I did not claim that it was unique to catnium. All of the creatures that
you list are often the prey of cats and may have trace amounts of catnium.
You don't see bears or wolves on hot tin roofs going Poof.
(2) Dave Hillman has never had to degauss a cat from Joan's refrigerator.
He has been quoted to say "I love cats, I just can't eat a whole one"
which has gotten him in serious issues with Joan;
I sense a cover-up here. I know there is that third cat in the house that
no one ever sees. It obviously runs in terror from you. I am pretty sure
Joan said it was from one of Dave's experiments gone horribly wrong.
(3) Discussions with a number of Ion Chromatography experts (who shall
remain nameless) provided this information " Technically Doug is analyzing
for an ion using IC and not the element so that detail may be grounds for
disqualification. More importantly, numerous IC experts maintain that
catnium co-elutes with ammonium since they have very similar chemical
properties and that separating the two requires additional techniques
beyond IC. Ludwig von Thermopolis Fischer wrote a paper entitled, "No
CAT-P here", where he tried doing as Doug suggested. He could not
distinguish between ammonium and catnium, which is why most
chromatographers don't even list catnium as a valid ion. You might say
that in the chromatography world ammonium has more stank on it.".
I wanna know who the traitors are. The Death Star has not been used for a
while. Dave you should know better than to argue chemistry with a
chemist. Ludwig was an idiot. For years he claimed he could not detect
catnium ions and it could not be separated out. He kept injecting cation
samples into his system that was setup for analyzing anions. Yup, no
cations here. And that was back in 1982. The columns today are much
better and I have eluent structures that will do the separation. Here, I
will prove it. I have attached my last calibration run. Catnium is
clearly separable from ammonium.
As to the argument that an ion is not the element, you have to be drunk.
If I analyze a solution and see sodium ions, where do you think it came
from? Americium? Sodium ions come from sodium, magnesium ions come from
magnesium, cations come from cats, etc.
I reject your rejection and am asking the court of public opinion to
overturn the disqualification. And you owe me a new Lame-O-Meter as your
response broke the one I have.
Doug Pauls
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|